eCommons

 

When Private Property Rights Collide With Growth Management Legislation

Other Titles

Abstract

Over the past century, ever-expanding urban and suburban growth in the United States has offered a clear sign of America’s economic vitality, but it has not come without unique challenges of its own. Indeed, efforts to promulgate “smart growth” legislation as an antidote to suburban “sprawl” have proliferated in the past three decades, but it is time we ask ourselves whether their benefits outweigh their unintended consequences. States and local governments that once enthusiastically touted such legislation are beginning to confront unforeseen obstacles – and litigation – that raise the need for immediate reform. This Article explores the impact of growth management acts on preexisting property rights, noting the inevitable and growing conflicts between the two sides that legislatures (and courts) are increasingly being forced to confront. We assess the problems with creating truly intelligent urban and suburban growth, from political pressures to inconsistent judicial determinations to NIMBYs to constitutional takings jurisprudence.

Journal / Series

Volume & Issue

Vol.13

Description

Sponsorship

Date Issued

2015-06-01

Publisher

Keywords

Cornell; real estate; smart growth; suburban sprawl; sprawl; state government; local government; intelligent growth; planning; NIMBYism; NIMBY; growth management; growth management legislation; municipal zoning; American Dream; Belle Terre decision; Euclid v. Amber Realty; zoning; land values; land use segregation; population density; suburban development; transit-oriented development; mixed-use infill; Phoenix; CityScape; Hawaii; Vermont; Oregon; FLorida; Maine; Rhode Island; Georgia; Washington; Maryland; Pennsylvania; Delaware; Tennessee; Colorado; urban growth boundaries; Oregon Land Use Planning Program; Land Conservation and Development Corporation; LCDC; Land Use Board of Appeals; LUBA; UGB; Rajneeshpuram; Oregon Supreme Court; Tom McCall; Chesapeake Bay; Priority Funding Areas; PFA; Minnesota; urban service areas; enterprise zones; New Jersey; 2020 plan; Virginia; Loudoun County; Horse Country; Dulles International Airport; Washington Dulles; Leesburg; West Virginia; commuters; constitutional takings; jurisprudence; Penn Central; economic impact; leapfrogging growth; viking properties v. holm; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Endangered Species Act; National Environmental Policy Act; National Land Use Planning Act; private property rights reform

Location

Effective Date

Expiration Date

Sector

Employer

Union

Union Local

NAICS

Number of Workers

Committee Chair

Committee Co-Chair

Committee Member

Degree Discipline

Degree Name

Degree Level

Related Version

Related DOI

Related To

Related Part

Based on Related Item

Has Other Format(s)

Part of Related Item

Related To

Related Publication(s)

Link(s) to Related Publication(s)

References

Link(s) to Reference(s)

Previously Published As

Government Document

ISBN

ISMN

ISSN

Other Identifiers

Rights

Required Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.

Rights URI

Types

article

Accessibility Feature

Accessibility Hazard

Accessibility Summary

Link(s) to Catalog Record