Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. College of Engineering
  3. Biological and Environmental Engineering
  4. BEE 4530 - Computer-Aided Engineering
  5. BEE 4530 - 2001 Student Papers
  6. Comparison of Vaccine Freezing Methods

Comparison of Vaccine Freezing Methods

Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/253
Collections
BEE 4530 - 2001 Student Papers
Author
Matthews, James
Cunningham, Megan
Joslin, Lisa
Peterson, David
Abstract

We have developed a temperature-sensitive vaccine formulation in a glass vial that needs to be frozen prior to lyophilization.The method for freezing the vial has traditionally been liquid nitrogen tunnel freezing, but this method can be expensive and has problems with sterilization of the tunnel.We explored the advantages of a shelf-freezing method and did a comparison analysis on the two freezing methods to determine which situation was the preferred one.For our analysis, the vaccine vial dimensions were obtained from research performed by Merck & Co., Inc.We predicted that the shelf-freezing method would take too long to freeze the vaccine, which in turn would decrease the potency of the vaccine.We simulated both freezing methods using the Gambit and FIDAP programs to produce two different designs.For the sensitivity analysis, we manipulated the boundary temperatures of the shelf and the liquid nitrogen as well as the convective coefficient for the ambient air in the shelf design.We determined that the shelf freezing method was the most optimal for the freezing of the vial when we lowered the shelf temperature due to the small differences in the freezing times between the two methods.

Description
No access to the full paper due to lack of a FERPA release.
Date Issued
2001-04-05T21:47:39Z
Keywords
nitrogen freezing
•
vaccine
Type
term paper

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance