eCommons

 

Driving Proactivity In Organizations: A Comparison Of Approaches To Increase Improvement-Oriented Voice

dc.contributor.authorMcClean, Elizabethen_US
dc.contributor.chairCollins, Christopher J.en_US
dc.contributor.chairCollins, Christopher J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDetert, James Rolanden_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDiciccio, Thomas Jen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDetert, James Rolanden_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBurris, Ethanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-28T19:24:46Z
dc.date.available2019-05-26T06:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-25en_US
dc.description.abstractLeaders rely on other organizational members to speak up with ideas for improvement, or to alert them to relevant information they may not otherwise see. Various factors predict whether or not individuals speak up with ideas for improvement, including personality (LePine & Van Dyne, 2001), beliefs about voice (Detert & Edmondson, 2011), and contextual factors like leadership and climate (Detert & Burris, 2007; Tangirala & Ramanujam, 2012; 2008). Despite myriad studies on the antecedents of speaking up, a critical question related to voice behavior in organizations remains largely unanswered - namely, whether and through which processes voice can be sustainably increased. Assessing the levers and process for change will allow for a more precise comparison of the drivers (i.e., beliefs, contextual effects) of voice behavior. Exploring whether and how voice can be increased also has important implications for innovation and improvement in organizations. To address this question, I conducted a field experiment in an Indian IT consulting company whereby I led interventions designed to target three antecedents to voice: ability (i.e., issue selling skills), beliefs about voice, and leader behaviors. Preliminary results suggest that targeting employees' ability to speak up creates significant change in in employee- and manager-rated voice. Additionally, these findings suggest that having the ability to speak up helps employees feel that it is more worthwhile and safer to do so. In this dissertation, I examine my theory of change in voice, describe the field experiment, and offer my findings. Finally, I draw conclusions and implications for driving improvement and innovation in organizations through employee voice.en_US
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 8641134
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/37053
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectEmployee Voiceen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational Behavioren_US
dc.subjectLeadershipen_US
dc.titleDriving Proactivity In Organizations: A Comparison Of Approaches To Increase Improvement-Oriented Voiceen_US
dc.typedissertation or thesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineIndustrial and Labor Relations
thesis.degree.grantorCornell Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.namePh. D., Industrial and Labor Relations

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ejm45.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format