Improving the Review Policy and Process for Authors and Reviewers

dc.contributor.author	Lynn, Michael
dc.date.accessioned	2020-09-12T21:04:49Z
dc.date.available	2020-09-12T21:04:49Z
dc.date.issued	2016-05-01
dc.description.abstract	[Excerpt] In this issue’s “From the Editor,” I describe a new review policy and process for both authors and reviewers. Authors should find that this new policy and process provides them with faster editorial decisions, higher quality feedback, and greater clarity about required revisions, as well as greater freedom to disagree with reviewers and to write the papers they (the authors) want. Reviewers should find that this new policy and process saves them from having to review obviously flawed papers and from having to review different versions of the same paper over and over again.
dc.description.legacydownloads	Lynn111_Improving_the_review_process.pdf: 149 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
dc.identifier.other	8708792
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/1813/71769
dc.language.iso	en_US
dc.rights	Required Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subject	Cornell
dc.subject	editorial
dc.subject	publishing
dc.subject	article submission
dc.subject	peer review
dc.title	Improving the Review Policy and Process for Authors and Reviewers
dc.type	article
local.authorAffiliation	Lynn, Michael: wml3@cornell.edu Cornell University

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1