Session 5: Disciplinary support: why is reproducibility not uniformly required across disciplines?
Loading...
No Access Until
Permanent Link(s)
Other Titles
Abstract
Why do learned societies decide (or not) to implement data (and code) availability policies? What influences the level of enforcement, and the choice of "enforcer" (data editor, administrative staff, referees)? What are reasons NOT to require data sharing or code sharing?
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
Description
Edited video of expert panel presentation and discussion originated via video conference.
Sponsorship
Date Issued
2023-01-31
Publisher
Labor Dynamics Institute
Keywords
Professional Societies; Scholarly Journals; Computational Research; Research practices; Reproducibility; Replicability; Data Management; Social Sciences
Location
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Sector
Employer
Union
Union Local
NAICS
Number of Workers
Committee Chair
Committee Co-Chair
Committee Member
Degree Discipline
Degree Name
Degree Level
Related Version
Related DOI
Related To
Related Part
Based on Related Item
Has Other Format(s)
Part of Related Item
Related To
Related Publication(s)
Link(s) to Related Publication(s)
References
Link(s) to Reference(s)
Previously Published As
Labor Dynamics Institute. (2023, February 5). CRRESS Session 5: Disciplinary support: why is reproducibility not uniformly required across disciplines?. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRwxOM15Zgk
Government Document
ISBN
ISMN
ISSN
Other Identifiers
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International
Rights URI
Types
video/moving image
Accessibility Feature
captions
Accessibility Hazard
none
Accessibility Summary
Captions are available. Slides are present, they are of accessable contrast. An image of a website front page is presented for impression only, content is of limited accessibility