eCommons

 

Skeptical Poiesis: Montaigne, Rimbaud

dc.contributor.authorHuelster, Nicholas Evan Lynch
dc.contributor.chairLong, Kathleen Perry
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGreenberg, Mitchell D.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMann, Jenny C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T15:51:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-05
dc.description217 pages
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation proposes that the oeuvre of Rimbaud is the next major link in the line of radical Pyrrhonian writing launched by Montaigne’s Les essais. Although some have noted that Rimbaud read Les essais and was excited by a passage concerning poetic inspiration, this dissertation proposes a different model of intertextuality showing that both writers created a Pyrrhonian structure of poetics and poiesis (concerning the inspiration for and creation of texts) as a response to a crisis. This model contends that Montaigne helps uncover an ongoing Pyrrhonian crisis through his popularization of ancient skepticism in his “Apologie de Raymond Sebond.” This crisis, which includes the paradox of radical doubt (that we can doubt our very act of doubting too), entails the suspension of judgment, but it also requires trying out different ideas and beliefs. Montaigne thus created a new form of writing about a mutable and multiple way of thinking and being in response to the crisis. Rather than taking a philosophical approach, this dissertation argues that Montaigne also turned to the power of poetry (and its need for ambiguity, vanity, and imagination) to find new and truer ways of reading and writing the world and the self. Rimbaud also wrote about a similar crisis, such as in his short story “Un cœur sous une soutane” which shows a young seminarian poet in his own personal and poetic crises. His Une saison en enfer expresses a metaphysical crisis, where the narrator-poet searches for a new way of believing and being, and a poetic crisis, where he both turns against his former poetic program, and presents the poems of his past, a dual structure of (non-)palinody recalling the (non-)apology structure of Montaigne’s “Apologie.” His texts continue to oscillate between new ideas and ways out of the crises and moments of despair and doubt, and through this oscillation, Rimbaud creates a new form of Pyrrhonian writing. This unique take on Montaigne and Rimbaud has implications for the radical practice of poiesis and poetics as responses to an unresolvable but generative Pyrrhonian crisis.
dc.description.embargo2024-06-02
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7298/8vvd-5f39
dc.identifier.otherHuelster_cornellgrad_0058F_13038
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/cornellgrad:13038
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/111722
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectMontaigne
dc.subjectPoetry
dc.subjectPoiesis
dc.subjectPyrrhonism
dc.subjectRimbaud
dc.subjectSkepticism
dc.titleSkeptical Poiesis: Montaigne, Rimbaud
dc.typedissertation or thesis
dcterms.licensehttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810.2
thesis.degree.disciplineRomance Studies
thesis.degree.grantorCornell University
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.namePh. D., Romance Studies

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Huelster_cornellgrad_0058F_13038.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format