South Bridge Student Case Response

dc.contributor.author	Kroll, Josh
dc.date.accessioned	2020-09-04T01:57:12Z
dc.date.available	2020-09-04T01:57:12Z
dc.date.issued	2002-06-01
dc.description.abstract	[Excerpt] ...I originally believed that the Chicago market could support any mixed use project. Following my initial impression, I felt that the South Bridge Redevelopment Project should have roughly equal proportions of leasable area designated for retail, office, and hotel. Furthermore, I saw the inclusion of a hotel facility as necessary, even though the associated risks are quite high. The market fundamentals seemed to be strong, but as you will see, the financial conclusions were in disagreement with my initial instincts. The following text will explain in further detail.
dc.description.legacydownloads	1_Kroll_2002_South_Bridge.pdf: 9 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
dc.identifier.other	9874899
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/1813/70578
dc.language.iso	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Cornell Real Estate Review
dc.rights	Required Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subject	Cornell
dc.subject	case study
dc.subject	redevelopment
dc.subject	commercial real estate
dc.subject	hotel property
dc.title	South Bridge Student Case Response
dc.type	article
local.authorAffiliation	Kroll, Josh: Cornell University
schema.issueNumber	Vol. 1

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1