Published 1999 by NABC.

The influence of agricultural biotechnology on industrial consolidation may have lasting effects on the ability of US agriculture to produce adequate, safe, and healthful supplies of food — and to do so in an environmentally acceptable fashion. The impacts of these new developments on production techniques, economics, and sociology of agriculture cannot be ignored.

While there is currently an adequate amount of food produced, worldwide 800 million are food insecure, 180 million of them children, a situation requiring considerable rethinking of methods of equitable food distribution. However, the growing world population may force not just better distribution, but increased production, not from more land used for agricultural production, but from increased yields and improved food quality. Consolidation may not be useful in developing nations.

The acceptance of the products of agricultural biotechnology are influenced by globalization, industrialization, decentralization, privatization, polarization, and engagement, all of which influence acceptance or rejection of new technologies by both producers and end-users. Organic farming sees many problems with the use of agricultural biotechnology to address world hunger and instead asks for decentralization and the use of integrated pest management. Those opposing agricultural biotechnology successfully appeal to an educated urban population with full food security and great distance from food production. They tend to ignore the need of the growing number of food insecure in developing nations. Without new technologies to increase productivity, more land – much of it currently left wild a wildlife habitats –will need to be taken into production to the detriment of ecosystems.

Recent Submissions

  • Where do we go from here? The view from Times Square 

    Raeburn, Paul (NABC, 1999)
    Biotechnology can be used to produce improved crop varieties for organic farmers, allowing them to produce tastier foods and a wider variety of foods without using chemicals— and the opportunity to use fewer pesticides and ...
  • Changing consumer demands can drive biotechnology adoption 

    Offutt, Susan (NABC, 1999)
    It is worth emphasizing the importance of understanding causality — why events happen —in trying to assess the role of biotechnology in the food and agriculture systems of both developed and developing nations. There is ...
  • Biotechnology on the ground: what kind of future can farmers expect and what kind should they create? 

    Kirschenmann, Frederick (NABC, 1999)
    Farmers will face many challenges if they want to work in a small scale, organically based agricultural system. Little research and technology development has been done to support this alternative direction. Market ...
  • Why biotechnology may not represent the future in world agriculture 

    Avery, Dennis T. (NABC, 1999)
    Agriculture has no choice but to provide fully adequate diets for the larger, more affluent human population projected for the year 2050. A the same time humanity wants to preserve the planet’s wild lands and wild species— ...
  • Biotechnology and mature capitalism 

    Heffernan, William D. (NABC, 1999)
    Biotechnology has been introduced much too rapidly into society and political, religious and social institutions, are not able to evolve fast enough to deal with the rapid introduction of such a powerful technology. Returning ...

View more


RSS Feeds