Skeptical Poiesis: Montaigne, Rimbaud
Access Restricted
Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.
During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.
No Access Until
Permanent Link(s)
Collections
Other Titles
Author(s)
Abstract
This dissertation proposes that the oeuvre of Rimbaud is the next major link in the line of radical Pyrrhonian writing launched by Montaigne’s Les essais. Although some have noted that Rimbaud read Les essais and was excited by a passage concerning poetic inspiration, this dissertation proposes a different model of intertextuality showing that both writers created a Pyrrhonian structure of poetics and poiesis (concerning the inspiration for and creation of texts) as a response to a crisis. This model contends that Montaigne helps uncover an ongoing Pyrrhonian crisis through his popularization of ancient skepticism in his “Apologie de Raymond Sebond.” This crisis, which includes the paradox of radical doubt (that we can doubt our very act of doubting too), entails the suspension of judgment, but it also requires trying out different ideas and beliefs. Montaigne thus created a new form of writing about a mutable and multiple way of thinking and being in response to the crisis. Rather than taking a philosophical approach, this dissertation argues that Montaigne also turned to the power of poetry (and its need for ambiguity, vanity, and imagination) to find new and truer ways of reading and writing the world and the self. Rimbaud also wrote about a similar crisis, such as in his short story “Un cœur sous une soutane” which shows a young seminarian poet in his own personal and poetic crises. His Une saison en enfer expresses a metaphysical crisis, where the narrator-poet searches for a new way of believing and being, and a poetic crisis, where he both turns against his former poetic program, and presents the poems of his past, a dual structure of (non-)palinody recalling the (non-)apology structure of Montaigne’s “Apologie.” His texts continue to oscillate between new ideas and ways out of the crises and moments of despair and doubt, and through this oscillation, Rimbaud creates a new form of Pyrrhonian writing. This unique take on Montaigne and Rimbaud has implications for the radical practice of poiesis and poetics as responses to an unresolvable but generative Pyrrhonian crisis.
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
Description
Sponsorship
Date Issued
Publisher
Keywords
Location
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Sector
Employer
Union
Union Local
NAICS
Number of Workers
Committee Chair
Committee Co-Chair
Committee Member
Mann, Jenny C.