JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Aristotle and the End of Tyranny

Author
Jochim, Jordan Daniel
Abstract
As form of rule, tyranny is broadly understood to consist of institutional deficits that leave a ruling party or actor unaccountable and unconstrained. As a figure in the history of political thought, the tyrant is characterized by his ethical immoderation and desire for gain. While scholars rightly identify Aristotle as a foundational theorist for this picture of tyranny and tyrant, I argue that they overlook the centrality Aristotle assigns to tyranny’s guarded orientation to power, as well as the tyrant’s anxieties regarding its potential loss. Taking as its point of departure Aristotle’s claim in Rhetoric 1.8 that the end or goal (telos) of tyranny is self-preservation (phulakē), this dissertation illuminates the ethical and political conditions, constraints, and pressures that characterize the Aristotelian tyrant’s defensiveness. Ruling over a regime populated by those whose sense of justice bristles at his disproportionate share of power, the Aristotelian tyrant, I argue, is driven by fear.
Description
166 pages
Date Issued
2021-08Subject
Aristotle; Tyranny
Committee Chair
Frank, Jill
Committee Member
Frank, Jason; Livingston, Alexander
Degree Discipline
Government
Degree Name
Ph. D., Government
Degree Level
Doctor of Philosophy
Type
dissertation or thesis