Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
DigitalCollections@ILR
ILR School
  1. Home
  2. ILR School
  3. ILR Collection
  4. ILR Articles and Chapters
  5. Ask in Person: You’re Less Persuasive Than You Think Over Email

Ask in Person: You’re Less Persuasive Than You Think Over Email

File(s)
Bohns21_Ask_in_person.pdf (705.13 KB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75289
Collections
ILR Articles and Chapters
Faculty Publications - Organizational Behavior
Author
Mahdi Roghanizad, M.
Bohns, Vanessa K.
Abstract

Research has found people underestimate the likelihood strangers will comply with their direct requests (Bohns, 2016; Flynn & Lake, 2008). Here we argue this “underestimation- of-compliance effect” may be limited to requests made face-to-face. We find when making direct requests over email, requesters instead overestimate compliance. In two studies, participants asked strangers to comply with requests either face-to-face or over email. Before making these requests, requesters estimated the number of people they expected to say “yes”. While requesters underestimated compliance in face-to-face contexts, replicating previous research, they overestimated compliance in email contexts. Analyses of several theorized mechanisms for this finding suggest that requesters, anchored on their own perspectives, fail to appreciate the suspicion, and resulting lack of empathy, with which targets view email requests from strangers. Given the prevalence of email and text-based communication, this is an extremely important moderator of the underestimation-of-compliance effect.

Date Issued
2016-01-01
Keywords
compliance
•
egocentrism
•
email
•
help-seeking
•
perspective-taking
•
social influence
•
trust
Related DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.002
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: © Elsevier. Final version published as: Mahdi Roghanizad, M., & Bohns, V. K. (2017). Ask in person: You're less persuasive than you think over email. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 223-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.002 Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance