Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Cornell University Graduate School
  3. Cornell Theses and Dissertations
  4. SUBSTRATES, STRUCTURES, AND FUNCTIONS OF THE CHLOROPLAST CLP PROTEASE SYSTEM IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA

SUBSTRATES, STRUCTURES, AND FUNCTIONS OF THE CHLOROPLAST CLP PROTEASE SYSTEM IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA

File(s)
Liao_cornellgrad_0058F_11341.pdf (17.1 MB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://doi.org/10.7298/qpkb-q465
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/67299
Collections
Cornell Theses and Dissertations
Author
Liao, Juiyun
Abstract

The caseinolytic proteolytic machinery (CLP) is an essential and abundant protease of the chloroplast protease network. It is composed of multiple components (a proteolytic core CLPP/R/T, chaperones CLPC1/C2/D, and adaptors CLPS1/F). Mostly based on functional and structural information from bacterial Clp systems, it is postulated that these chloroplast CLP chaperones are aided by the CLP adaptors to select and deliver substrates to the proteolytic chamber (protease core) for degradation. The chloroplast CLPPRT proteolytic core is different and far more complex than the bacterial or mitochondria Clp core. The chloroplast CLP core is a hetero-oligomeric tetradecamer that is associated with additional accessory proteins unique to higher plants. Furthermore, the chloroplast CLPP and CLPR subunits have C-terminal extensions with unknown functions. It is unclear why chloroplast CLP core shows such high complexity and how these different CLP subunits contribute to the proteolytic system. Finally, relatively few chloroplast CLP substrates have been identified. To better understand the chloroplast CLP protease system, I applied an in vivo trapping approach for substrate identification and crosslinking (XL) mass spectrometry (MS) for investigation of the proximity and possible protein-protein interactions between these CLP components. Functional complementation showed that CLPP5 is crucial for CLP catalysis, whereas CLPP3 plays an essential role in CLP structure but its catalytic activity is dispensable. However, in vivo trapping using CLPPRT complexes with a reduced number of catalytic triads through the presence of one or more catalytically inactivated CLPP3/5 subunits did not identify proteins trapped in these CLPPRT complexes. This suggests that reduced proteolytic capacity within CLP cores does not result in a bottleneck for protein degradation in vivo. XL-MS of affinity-purified CLP core complexes or affinity purified CLPC-TRAP complexes identified several putative domains and motifs involved in the CLP protein-protein interactions. The newly established workflow of in vitro DSSO crosslinking using plant proteins paves the way for a more detailed exploration of the 3D structure and possible regulation of the chloroplast CLP machinery.

Date Issued
2019-05-30
Keywords
CLP
•
subtrate
•
trapping
•
Proteolysis
•
Biochemistry
•
Botany
•
protease
•
Plant sciences
Committee Chair
Van Wijk, Klaas
Committee Member
Hanson, Maureen R.
Qian, Shu-Bing
Degree Discipline
Plant Biology
Degree Name
Ph.D., Plant Biology
Degree Level
Doctor of Philosophy
Type
dissertation or thesis

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance