Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Weill Cornell Medicine
  3. Medical College Research and Papers
  4. Department of Neurological Surgery
  5. Minimally invasive tubular decompression versus traditional open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Minimally invasive tubular decompression versus traditional open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

File(s)
41354742.pdf (2.78 MB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/124347
Collections
Department of Neurological Surgery
Author
Kartal, A.
Manalil, N.F.
Hamad, M.K.
Paracha, S.
Robayo, A.
Wang, E.
Hussain, I.
Hartl, R.
Abstract

Minimally invasive (MI) tubular decompression seeks to reduce soft‚Äëtissue trauma compared with open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We performed a PRISMA‚Äëcompliant systematic review and meta‚Äëanalysis of comparative studies (2015-April 2025) identified in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Adults with symptomatic degenerative LSS undergoing MI tubular decompression or open laminectomy were included. Evaluated outcomes included surgical parameters (e.g., overall complications; dural tears, surgical site infections, reoperation), perioperative and postoperative complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Heterogeneity was measured using I2. Random-effects models were primary; PROMs were also analyzed in a common-effect sensitivity analysis. Nine studies involving ten cohorts and a total of 2,860 patients were analyzed from 2,853 records. Random-effects models pooled odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD); PROMs were additionally examined with a common-effect model as a sensitivity analysis. MI tubular surgery was associated with fewer overall complications (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.86), fewer surgical site infections (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.69), lower EBL (MD - 46.65 mL, 95% CI - 80.89 to - 12.41), and shorter LOS (MD - 1.39 days, 95% CI - 1.99 to - 0.79). Reoperation, operative time, dural tears, and PROMs did not differ significantly. Overall, our results suggest that MI tubular-assisted decompression may offer advantages over open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. It was associated with lower perioperative morbidity and resource utilization - including lower overall complication rates, fewer surgical-site infections, reduced blood loss, and shorter hospital stays - while achieving similar patient-reported outcomes. Given between-study heterogeneity and the predominance of retrospective cohorts, these results should be interpreted with appropriate caution; nevertheless, when feasible and in appropriately selected patients and settings, tubular-assisted decompression may be considered a preferable option.

Journal / Series
Scientific reports
Volume & Issue
16(1)
Date Issued
2025-12-07
Publisher
Nature Research
Keywords
WCM Library Coordinated Deposit
•
Humans
•
Spinal Stenosis/surgery
•
Decompression, Surgical/methods/adverse effects
•
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods/adverse effects
•
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery
•
Laminectomy/methods/adverse effects
•
Postoperative Complications/etiology
•
Length of Stay
•
Treatment Outcome
•
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)
•
Meta-analysis
•
Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS)
•
Open laminectomy
•
Systematic review
•
Tubular decompression
Related DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28949-9
Previously Published as
Kartal A, Manalil NF, Hamad MK, Paracha S, Robayo A, Wang E, Hussain I, H√§rtl R. Minimally invasive tubular decompression versus traditional open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific reports. 2025;16(1):176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-28949-9. PMID: 41354742.
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Rights URI
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance