Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Cornell SC Johnson College of Business
  3. Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration
  4. School of Hotel Administration Collection
  5. SHA Articles and Chapters
  6. The Perversity of Sexual-harassment Law: Effects of Recent Court Rulings

The Perversity of Sexual-harassment Law: Effects of Recent Court Rulings

File(s)
Sturman72_The_Prevention_of_Sexual_harassment_Law.pdf (1.3 MB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/71855
Collections
SHA Articles and Chapters
Author
Sherwyn, David
Sturman, Michael C.
Eigen, Zev J.
Heise, Michael
Walwyn, Jenn
Abstract

The outcome of 109 motions for summary judgment filed since June 1998, in which employers argued that a hostile-environment case should be dismissed because the employer satisfied, as a matter of law, the affirmative defense are analyzed. The examination of these cases provides the opportunity to test past conjecture and describe how courts have implemented the Ellerh and Faragher rulings. It is found that employers are still able to prevail in summary-judgment motions. With evidence showing that employers can satisfy the affirmative defense, each of the three areas that commentators have suggested should have prevented such success is examined. What courts required to constitute reasonable care, how courts have ruled when employees failed to report harassment, and how courts have ruled when employees did report harassment.

Date Issued
2001-06-01
Keywords
court decisions
•
employers
•
policy making
•
studies
•
liability
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance