Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
DigitalCollections@ILR
ILR School
  1. Home
  2. ILR School
  3. Centers, Institutes, Programs
  4. Labor Dynamics Institute
  5. Labor Dynamics Institute Publications
  6. Why the Economics Profession Must Actively Participate in the Privacy Protection Debate

Why the Economics Profession Must Actively Participate in the Privacy Protection Debate

File(s)
ceswp_2019_abowdschmuttesextonvilhuber.pdf (125.93 KB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/89107
Collections
Labor Dynamics Institute Publications
Author
Abowd, John M.
Schmutte, Ian M.
Sexton, William
Vilhuber, Lars
Abstract

When Google or the U.S. Census Bureau publish detailed statistics on browsing habits or neighborhood characteristics, some privacy is lost for everybody while supplying public information. To date, economists have not focused on the privacy loss inherent in data publication. In their stead, these issues have been advanced almost exclusively by computer scientists who are primarily interested in technical problems associated with protecting privacy. Economists should join the discussion, first, to determine where to balance privacy protection against data quality; a social choice problem. Furthermore, economists must ensure new privacy models preserve the validity of public data for economic research.

Description
Abowd, Sexton, and Vilhuber: U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA and Cornell University, Ives Hall, Ithaca, NY, USA. Schmutte: U.S. Census Bureau and University of Georgia, Amos Hall, Athens, GA, USA. This research was partially funded through NSF Grant #1131848 (NCRN) and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Grant G-2015-13903. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not those of the U.S. Census Bureau or other sponsors.
Date Issued
2019-05-01
Keywords
privacy
•
privacy models
Related Version
Published as: Abowd, John M., Ian M. Schmutte, William N. Sexton, and Lars Vilhuber. 2019. "Why the Economics Profession Must Actively Participate in the Privacy Protection Debate." AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109 : 397-402.
DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20191106
Related DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20191106

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance