Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Cornell University Graduate School
  3. Cornell Theses and Dissertations
  4. SURFACE BLOCKING APPROACHES FOR AREA-SELECTIVE ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION USING SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITORS AND COADSORBATES

SURFACE BLOCKING APPROACHES FOR AREA-SELECTIVE ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITION USING SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITORS AND COADSORBATES

File(s)
Vaidya_cornell_0058O_12486.pdf (29.5 MB)
No Access Until
2026-09-09
Permanent Link(s)
https://doi.org/10.7298/ehtx-q388
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/120718
Collections
Cornell Theses and Dissertations
Author
Vaidya, Saloni
Abstract

As the semiconductor industry advances towards increasingly complex 3D structures, it requires deposition techniques which offer atomic level control and conformality. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) has emerged as a bottom-up method to meet these demands. This work investigates two surface blocking approaches for area-selective ALD (AS-ALD) to inhibit growth of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) on silicon dioxide (SiO2) surfaces. Experiments were conducted using in-situ quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) to monitor mass changes in real time. A drift correction method was developed to improve the accuracy of data affected by thermal fluctuations. The effectiveness of Dimethylaminotrimethylsilane (DMATMS) as the small molecule inhibitor (SMI) and Alcohol X as the coadsorbate was evaluated across various conditions. Experiments were conducted to test all combinations using Trimethylaluminum (TMA) and bis-dimethylamino-diamino-aluminum (BDMADA- Al) as the precursors, with water (H2O) and tert-butanol (t-BuOH) as the co-reactants, at two temperatures: 120°C and 285°C. The first approach, the ABC process, involved an inhibitor soak (“C”) followed by cycles of precursor (“A”), coreactant (“B”) and inhibitor (“C”) reapplication which demonstrated promising blocking ability. The second approach, the ABCD process introduced the coadsorbate (“D”) with the precursor to enable competitive adsorption while retaining the inhibitor soak and the reapplication step. Results using coadsorbate showed better blocking performance as compared to the ABC process.

Description
82 pages
Date Issued
2025-08
Committee Chair
Engstrom, James
Committee Member
DiStasio, Robert
Degree Discipline
Chemical Engineering
Degree Name
M.S., Chemical Engineering
Degree Level
Master of Science
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Rights URI
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Type
dissertation or thesis

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance