Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
DigitalCollections@ILR
ILR School
  1. Home
  2. ILR School
  3. ILR Collection
  4. ILR Working Papers
  5. Resident and Nonresident Tuition and Enrollment at Flagship State Universities

Resident and Nonresident Tuition and Enrollment at Flagship State Universities

File(s)
cheri_wp26.pdf (565.85 KB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/74663
Collections
Cornell Higher Education Research Institute (CHERI)
Faculty Publications - Labor Economics
ILR Student Works
ILR Working Papers
Author
Rizzo, Michael J.
Ehrenberg, Ronald G.
Abstract

[Excerpt] The recent economic downturn in the United States has led to severe current and projected budget deficits in most states. Sharp rises in healthcare costs and increased competition for state funds from other sources has concurrently led to a decrease in the shares of state budgets earmarked for the higher education sector.1 Because universities are able to attract revenue from other sources (e.g. tuition, annual giving and federal student aid) and they are a discretionary component of most state budgets, they are often the first to go under the knife during tough times. The resulting revenue shortages from these budget cuts will most certainly have deleterious effects on college accessibility and on the behavior of these higher educational institutions. Inasmuch as 65% of the 9.2 million students enrolled in four-year institutions in 1999 were enrolled in public institutions and in most states the major public research universities are also the most selective in terms of admissions, it is important to understand institutional responses relating to tuition and enrollment policies, as well as the likely changes in state grant aid policies. How tuition levels, or the availability of grant or loan aid, influence access are empirical questions that we will not address in this chapter. Rather, we will analyze how tuition and enrollment strategies at institutions react to changes in federal and state student need based aid and to state appropriations to public higher education institutions. The former increases student mobility by expanding their choice set, while the latter does not travel with the student.

Date Issued
2003-08-04
Keywords
state universities
•
tuition
•
financial aid
•
enrollment policies
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: Published by the Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, Cornell University.
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance