Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Cornell SC Johnson College of Business
  3. Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration
  4. School of Hotel Administration Collection
  5. SHA Articles and Chapters
  6. Deferring for Justice: How Administrative Agencies Can Solve the Employment Dispute Quagmire by Endorsing an Improved Arbitration System

Deferring for Justice: How Administrative Agencies Can Solve the Employment Dispute Quagmire by Endorsing an Improved Arbitration System

File(s)
Sherwyn85_Deferring_for_justice.pdf (248.26 KB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/71814
Collections
SHA Articles and Chapters
Author
Eigen, Zev J.
Sherwyn, David S.
Abstract

[Excerpt] When it comes to the issue of pre-dispute mandatory arbitration, the concept of attaining justice for all parties in a vacuum instead of in comparison to the fall back—the litigation and agency adjudication processes. In this Article, we address each of the components of arbitration, but in context to the alternative and thus, conclude that a fixed arbitration system will provide the type of justice unavailable in the current system.

Date Issued
2017-06-01
Keywords
arbitration
•
class action
•
dispute resolution
•
empirical studies
•
Mandatory Arbitration Act (MAA)
•
pre-dispute mandatory arbitration
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance