Thinking about Hope in the Care of Cancer Patients
Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.
During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.
Medical science has delivered extraordinary advances during my forty-year career as a medical oncologist. But might the science's justified prestige unhelpfully diminish our respect for other needed forms for understanding the human experience? This is a critical issue for physicians, who may be present with patients at moments of profound existential challenge. By equating hope with scientific progress and limiting its own role to purveyor of the latest that science has on offer, the medical profession may unwittingly add to the burden on patients with advanced cancer. Humanistic understandings of hope drawn from philosophy, theology, and literature serve as essential-at their best, equally true-partners to the portrait offered by experimental science. Physicians, in their manner of interacting with patients, may serve as both messengers of and models for a deeper understanding of hope that fully embodies the significance of human life and sustains patients when they most need support.