Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
DigitalCollections@ILR
ILR School
  1. Home
  2. ILR School
  3. ILR Collection
  4. ILR Articles and Chapters
  5. Levels of Abstraction in Legal Thinking

Levels of Abstraction in Legal Thinking

File(s)
Gold28_Levels_of_abstraction.pdf (922.51 KB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75811
Collections
Faculty Publications - Labor Relations, Law, and History
ILR Articles and Chapters
Author
Gold, Michael Evan
Abstract

[Excerpt] This article applies the concept of levels of abstraction to legal thinking. Perhaps the most important use of the concept is to constrain judicial lawmaking in a principled way. Level of abstraction refers to: the numbers of persons and transactions that generate an issue, the numbers of persons and transactions of which a piece of evidence is true, the numbers of persons and transactions to which an argument applies, and the numbers of persons and transactions that are affected by the resolution of an issue. In general, the more persons and transactions to which an issue and its resolution apply, the higher the level of abstraction of the issue and resolution; and the more persons and transactions of which a piece of evidence is true, or to which an argument applies, the higher the level of abstraction of the evidence.

Date Issued
2018-01-01
Keywords
legal thinking
•
abstraction
•
legal issues
•
resolution
•
practices
•
argumentation
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: © Southern Illinois University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Type
article

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance