Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Undergraduate Honors Theses
  3. College of Human Ecology Honors Theses
  4. Policy Analysis and Management (PAM) Theses
  5. MISSING THE MARK: AN EVALUATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION’S RED FLAG INITIATIVE AS A LONG-TERM SOLUTION TO DECEPTIVE WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCT ADVERTISING

MISSING THE MARK: AN EVALUATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION’S RED FLAG INITIATIVE AS A LONG-TERM SOLUTION TO DECEPTIVE WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCT ADVERTISING

File(s)
2018.05.09 Mara Schein_Thesis_Final (1).pdf (4.86 MB)
This study examines the efficacy of the Federal Trade Commission’s Red Flag initiative (2003), which aimed to curb the prevalence of seven deceptive (“Red Flag”) claims in over-the-counter weight loss product advertising. The principal component of this effort was the Commission’s promotion of voluntary guidelines which encouraged media outlets to screen advertisements for the seven Red Flag claims prior to publication. By analyzing the content of all English-language advertisement airings appearing in nationally circulated print magazines or any (local or national) TV programs between 2010 and 2011, this study evaluates the success of the Red Flag initiative as a long-term regulatory solution to deceptive advertising in this market. This study finds that the Federal Trade Commission’s Red Flag initiative, which essentially relied on industry self-regulation, failed to halt the dissemination of the seven Red Flag claims during the time period analyzed. Moreover, in response to the Commission’s actions, manufacturers appear to have engaged in offsetting behaviors and employed other creative content to imply the same “deceptive” information in their advertising, allowing them to avoid scrutiny while continuing to mislead consumers. The study explores both individual consumer and market consequences of the findings as well as raises policy implications for future regulatory action.
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/57304
Collections
Policy Analysis and Management (PAM) Theses
Author
Schein, Mara
Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of the Federal Trade Commission’s Red Flag initiative (2003), which aimed to curb the prevalence of seven deceptive (“Red Flag”) claims in over-the-counter weight loss product advertising. The principal component of this effort was the Commission’s promotion of voluntary guidelines which encouraged media outlets to screen advertisements for the seven Red Flag claims prior to publication. By analyzing the content of all English-language advertisement airings appearing in nationally circulated print magazines or any (local or national) TV programs between 2010 and 2011, this study evaluates the success of the Red Flag initiative as a long-term regulatory solution to deceptive advertising in this market. This study finds that the Federal Trade Commission’s Red Flag initiative, which essentially relied on industry self-regulation, failed to halt the dissemination of the seven Red Flag claims during the time period analyzed. Moreover, in response to the Commission’s actions, manufacturers appear to have engaged in offsetting behaviors and employed other creative content to imply the same “deceptive” information in their advertising, allowing them to avoid scrutiny while continuing to mislead consumers. The study explores both individual consumer and market consequences of the findings as well as raises policy implications for future regulatory action.

Date Issued
2018-05-07
Keywords
MISSING THE MARK: AN EVALUATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION’S RED FLAG INITIATIVE AS A LONG-TERM SOLUTION TO DECEPTIVE WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCT ADVERTISING
Type
dissertation or thesis

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance