Cornell University
Library
Cornell UniversityLibrary

eCommons

Help
Log In(current)
DigitalCollections@ILR
ILR School
  1. Home
  2. ILR School
  3. ILR Collection
  4. ILR Articles and Chapters
  5. Patterned Responses to Organizing: Case Studies of the Union-Busting Convention

Patterned Responses to Organizing: Case Studies of the Union-Busting Convention

File(s)
Hurd47_Patterned_Responses.pdf (1.59 MB)
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75943
Collections
Faculty Publications - Labor Relations, Law, and History
ILR Articles and Chapters
Author
Hurd, Richard W.
Uehlein, Joseph B.
Abstract

[Excerpt] In June 1993, the Industrial Union Department (IUD) of the AFL-CIO initiated a project to gather cases from affiliated unions that would highlight aspects of the National Labor Relations Board process deserving attention from those shaping labor law reform proposals. Based on the cases submitted, we conclude that in its current form the National Labor Relations Act serves to impede union organizing. Particularly problematic are NLRB policies that allow employers to wage no-holds-barred antiunion campaigns. Even where there are legal restrictions on specific actions, the penalties for violations are so meager that they serve no deterrent effect. The cases described below cover many industries, all parts of the country, large units and small, and collectively suggest that union busting has become the convention among U.S. employers.

Date Issued
1994-01-01
Keywords
unions
•
labor movement
•
organizing
•
worker rights
•
United States
•
labor law
•
National Labor Relations Board
•
NLRB
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: Reprinted with permission of Cornell University.
Type
book chapter

Site Statistics | Help

About eCommons | Policies | Terms of use | Contact Us

copyright © 2002-2026 Cornell University Library | Privacy | Web Accessibility Assistance