Coding for Cause or Cash? Client Choices and Job Quality in Tech Worker Cooperatives: Evidence from Argentina and the UK
Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.
During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.
Despite tech firms posting record profits, waves of layoffs have left tech workers facing unprecedented job insecurity and dissatisfaction. This study explores how tech worker cooperatives directly address the challenge of balancing job quality with financial sustainability. Through comparative analysis of tech worker cooperatives in Argentina’s FACT[TIC] and UK’s CoTech networks, I find members prioritize distinct job quality outcomes based on their context. Job quality in these cases hinges on client selection, itself influenced by socioeconomic and market factors. Based on interviews with tech worker cooperatives in Argentina, I introduce dignity as a subjective dimension of job quality not captured in dominant academic frameworks. Dignity refers to achieving independence from an employer through worker ownership and management that cooperatives offer. In this upper-middle income country facing economic volatility and limited domestic market for tech services, FACT[TIC]’s cooperatives adopt a client-pragmatic approach. They favor foreign clients who provide financial security. Through establishing and running worker cooperatives where workers exercise autonomy from employers, FACT[TIC]’s worker cooperatives prioritize dignity as their main job quality outcome. In contrast, CoTech’s worker cooperatives prioritize job satisfaction. Job satisfaction refers to the subjective assessment of work. In the UK, these tech worker cooperatives understand job satisfaction as working on projects and clients with positive social and environmental impact. Operating in a stable and developed economy with strong domestic demand for tech services, these cooperatives adopt a client-idealistic strategy, prioritizing an ethical national market niche. This allows them to maximize job satisfaction as their core job quality outcome. This study explores how tech worker cooperatives navigate challenges shaped by local and global socioeconomic and market factors. It contributes to resource-dependence theory and the literature on cooperatives and hybrid organizations by illuminating how these cooperatives balance their cooperative ideals and the practical need for financial sustainability.