Psychostimulants for Depression in Serious Illness: Limited Evidence, Select Indications
Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.
During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.
Depression is common in serious illness, yet traditional antidepressants have a delayed onset. Psychostimulants offer potentially rapid symptom relief, but their evidence base for depression, especially in medically complex patients, remains unclear. In this Palliative Care Rounds, we review the evidence for the use of psychostimulants as monotherapy or augmentation for major depressive disorder, including trials enrolling patients with cancer or other serious illnesses. Evidence for monotherapy is weak: meta-analyses of small, methodologically-limited trials suggest modest benefit compared with placebo. Augmentation studies demonstrate statistically significant but clinically small effects. Data in people with serious illnesses is limited to a small number of heterogeneous trials with inconsistent findings. Overall, psychostimulants have limited evidence for depression in serious illness, particularly as monotherapy. Given evidence for alternative rapid-acting interventions, such as ketamine/esketamine or second-generation antipsychotic augmentation, psychostimulants should be used sparingly and reserved for specific scenarios (e.g., comorbid ADHD or prior robust response).