eCommons

 

Intraoperative Margin Analysis Does Not Improve Outcomes in Treatment-Naive or Neoadjuvantly-Treated Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Access Restricted

Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.

During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.

No Access Until

2026-06-20
Permanent Link(s)

Other Titles

Abstract

The prognostic relevance of intraoperative frozen section (IOF) margin analysis for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is debatable in both those treated with upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy. We analyzed the impact of intraoperative and final microscopic margin clearance in neoadjuvantly treated (n=71) and treatment naive (n=109) patients with PDAC. Overall survival (OS) was longer in the treatment naive (43 months) compared to the neoadjuvant (27 months) cohort (p=0.02). Overall, 24 (34%) patients in the neoadjuvant and 22 (20%) patients in the treatment naive group had positive final margins, 13 and 10 of which were detected intraoperatively, respectively. At a median follow-up of 21 months, recurrence rates were 65% in the treatment naive and 66% in the neoadjuvant cohort and were similar regardless of margin status assessed via IOF or permanent sections. Disease free survival (DFS) was significantly shorter in treatment naive patients with positive (11 months) compared to negative (30 months) final margins (p=0.03). Neither IOF nor final margin status was significantly associated with DFS in neoadjuvantly treated patients, nor were they associated with OS in either cohort. Multivariate analysis showed that lymphovascular, and perineural invasion were significantly associated with DFS, and lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with OS. Our results suggest that IOF of selected margins does not correlate with survival and is of limited utility in treatment naive and neoadjuvantly treated PDAC patients.

Journal / Series

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc

Volume & Issue

38(11)

Description

Sponsorship

Date Issued

2025-06-20

Publisher

Elsevier

Keywords

WCM Library Coordinated Deposit; Whipple; distal pancreatectomy; frozen section; pancreaticoduodenectomy

Location

Effective Date

Expiration Date

Sector

Employer

Union

Union Local

NAICS

Number of Workers

Committee Chair

Committee Co-Chair

Committee Member

Degree Discipline

Degree Name

Degree Level

Related Version

Related To

Related Part

Based on Related Item

Has Other Format(s)

Part of Related Item

Related To

Related Publication(s)

Link(s) to Related Publication(s)

References

Link(s) to Reference(s)

Previously Published As

Li X, Malik P, Bhalla A, McAuliffe JC, Panarelli NC. Intraoperative Margin Analysis Does Not Improve Outcomes in Treatment-Naive or Neoadjuvantly-Treated Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 2025;38(11):100826. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100826. PMID: 40544923.

Government Document

ISBN

ISMN

ISSN

Other Identifiers

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Types

article

Accessibility Feature

Accessibility Hazard

Accessibility Summary

Link(s) to Catalog Record