Who's to Blame for Article Duplication?
dc.contributor.author | Davis, Philip M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2005-12-22T16:45:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2005-12-22T16:45:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | We may have just witnessed the very worst of academic publishing? a scenario in which commercial interests have outweighed editorial integrity and independence. At a time when academics have expressed great fears that commercial publishers are exploiting the scholarly publishing process, it is far too easy to level blame entirely on Emerald without considering our own actions. Publishing does not exist without authors, reviewers, editors, editorial boards, and librarians; it operates with the support, participation and consent of the academic community. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 60107 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Portal, 5(2), 2005, pp. 149-150 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1813/2576 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Johns Hopkins | en_US |
dc.subject | MCB University Press | en_US |
dc.subject | Emerald Publishing Group Ltd. | en_US |
dc.subject | article republishing | en_US |
dc.subject | article duplication | en_US |
dc.subject | ethical responsibility | en_US |
dc.title | Who's to Blame for Article Duplication? | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1