eCommons

 

Who's to Blame for Article Duplication?

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Philip M.
dc.date.accessioned2005-12-22T16:45:35Z
dc.date.available2005-12-22T16:45:35Z
dc.date.issued2005-04
dc.description.abstractWe may have just witnessed the very worst of academic publishing? a scenario in which commercial interests have outweighed editorial integrity and independence. At a time when academics have expressed great fears that commercial publishers are exploiting the scholarly publishing process, it is far too easy to level blame entirely on Emerald without considering our own actions. Publishing does not exist without authors, reviewers, editors, editorial boards, and librarians; it operates with the support, participation and consent of the academic community.en_US
dc.format.extent60107 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationPortal, 5(2), 2005, pp. 149-150en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/2576
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohns Hopkinsen_US
dc.subjectMCB University Pressen_US
dc.subjectEmerald Publishing Group Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectarticle republishingen_US
dc.subjectarticle duplicationen_US
dc.subjectethical responsibilityen_US
dc.titleWho's to Blame for Article Duplication?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
5.2davis.pdf
Size:
58.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format