Library

eCommons

 

Accepting Equality: Rhetorical Reactions to the Changing Politics of De Jure Segregation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFrug, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-07T16:27:54Z
dc.date.available2013-07-07T06:19:47Z
dc.date.issued2008-07-07T16:27:54Z
dc.description.abstractAfter the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, advocacy of de jure segregation quickly ceased to be an acceptable position within American political discourse. The speed of the political shift left figures who had openly supported de jure segregation with a political problem: how would they explain their former support for a position which had rapidly become not only discarded, but actively disreputable to have held? This study explores the responses to this dilemma through a series of case studies, highlighting different characteristic approaches that various figures took. George Wallace is examined as an example of a politician who tried -- although less effusively than is commonly believed -- to apologize for his former position. Strom Thurmond is examined as an example of a politician who, to the greatest extent possible, took refuge in silence about his former political stances. Robert Bork, whose opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act became infamous during the hearings about his nomination to the Supreme Court, is considered as someone who wrote off his former position as a technical (and therefore reasonable) mistake. The case of Herman Talmadge is used as an example of a politician who took refuge in a thin veneer of technical denials. Political commentator William F. Buckley's inconsistent and evasive answers present yet another strategy. And one politician who refused to accede to the new political consensus, Lester Maddox, is used to explore what happened to those who failed to shift with the times. A final chapter explores the attempts of later self-identified conservatives to grapple with the oft-overlooked roots of the conservative movement's political successes in segregationist ideology and Jim Crow's former supporters.en_US
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 6397180
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/11083
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectsegregationen_US
dc.subjectAmerican political discourseen_US
dc.subjectGeorge Wallaceen_US
dc.subjectStrom Thurmonden_US
dc.subjectRobert Borken_US
dc.subjectHerman Talmadgeen_US
dc.subjectWilliam F. Buckleyen_US
dc.subjectLester Maddoxen_US
dc.subjectconservative movementen_US
dc.subjectJim Crowen_US
dc.subjectCivil Rights Movementen_US
dc.subjectTrent Lotten_US
dc.titleAccepting Equality: Rhetorical Reactions to the Changing Politics of De Jure Segregationen_US
dc.typedissertation or thesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Frug_Accepting Equality.pdf
Size:
4.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Cornell Theses and Dissertations