Between Dec. 23, 2024 and Jan. 3, 2025, eCommons staff will not be available to answer email and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan. 6. If you need a DOI for a dataset during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. If you need support submitting material before the winter break, please contact us by Thursday, Dec. 19 at noon. Thank you!

eCommons

 

Data From: The Earthquake Arrest Zone

Other Titles

Abstract

These data are from Laboratory Earthquake Experiments from the Cornell 3 m apparatus in support of the following research: Loading a 3-meter granite slab containing a saw-cut simulated fault, we generated slip events that spontaneously nucleate, propagate, and arrest before reaching the ends of the sample. These rupture events have a slip distribution that varies along the fault and make them more similar to natural earthquakes than standard stick-slip events that rupture the entire sample. We propose an analytical crack model that fits our measurements. Similar to natural earthquakes, laboratory measurements show coseismic slip that gradually tapers near the rupture tips. Measured stress changes show roughly constant stress drop in the center of the ruptured region, a maximum stress increase near the rupture tips, and a smooth transition in between, in a region we describe as the earthquake arrest zone. The proposed model generalizes the widely used elliptical crack model by adding gradually tapered slip at the ends of the rupture. Different from the cohesive zone described by fracture mechanics, we propose that the transition in stress changes and the corresponding linear taper observed in the earthquake arrest zone are the result of rupture termination conditions primarily controlled by the initial stress distribution. It is the heterogeneous initial stress distribution that controls the arrest of laboratory earthquakes, and the features of static stress changes. We also performed dynamic rupture simulations that confirm how arrest conditions can affect slip taper and static stress changes. If applicable to larger natural earthquakes, this distinction between an earthquake arrest zone (that depends on stress conditions) and a cohesive zone (that depends primarily on strength evolution) has important implications for how seismic observations of earthquake fracture energy should be interpreted.

Journal / Series

Volume & Issue

Description

Please note the zipped data file is approximately 1.7GB in size and may take a long time to download.

Sponsorship

This work was sponsored by USGS Earthquake hazards grant G18AP00010 and National Science Foundation grants EAR-1645163, EAR-1763499, and EAR-1847139.

Date Issued

2020-12-16

Publisher

Keywords

analytical crack model; crack tip; earthquake termination

Location

Effective Date

Expiration Date

Sector

Employer

Union

Union Local

NAICS

Number of Workers

Committee Chair

Committee Co-Chair

Committee Member

Degree Discipline

Degree Name

Degree Level

Related Version

Related DOI

Related To

Related Part

Based on Related Item

Has Other Format(s)

Part of Related Item

Related To

Related Publication(s)

Chun-Yu Ke, Gregory C McLaskey, David S Kammer, The earthquake arrest zone, Geophysical Journal International, Volume 224, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa386

Link(s) to Related Publication(s)

References

Link(s) to Reference(s)

Previously Published As

Government Document

ISBN

ISMN

ISSN

Other Identifiers

Rights

CC0 1.0 Universal

Types

dataset

Accessibility Feature

Accessibility Hazard

Accessibility Summary

Link(s) to Catalog Record