<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href='static/style.xsl' type='text/xsl'?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-21T09:58:04Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/59517" metadataPrefix="dim">https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/59517</identifier><datestamp>2026-05-15T19:48:42Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1813_57466</setSpec><setSpec>com_1813_57353</setSpec><setSpec>com_1813_11653</setSpec><setSpec>com_1813_35</setSpec><setSpec>col_1813_57467</setSpec><setSpec>col_1813_47</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Otto, Steven</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="chair">Just, David R.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="committeeMember">Schulze, William D.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="committeeMember">Ortiz Bobea, Ariel</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="committeeMember">Messer, Kent Donald</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2018-10-23T13:33:01Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2019-02-22T07:00:32Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2018-08-30</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="other">ProQuest Submission ID: 10942</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="other">ProQuest Publication ID: 10840538</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1813/59517</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="doi">https://doi.org/10.7298/X4H993D2</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="bibid">10489613</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">This dissertation includes two chapters. The first presents a new auction mechanism designed for conservation programs. Individuals compensated for conserving their land often extract substantial profits from the government or non-governmental agency funding the conservation program. These rents limit the amount of land which can be conserved, which decreases total surplus for society. The new auction mechanism, the Provision Point Reverse Auction, was designed to mitigate this rent-seeking behavior. This paper presents both theoretical and experimental evidence to substantiate the efficacy of the mechanism. The second chapter considers the effect that preference uncertainty may have on two commonly observed behavioral anomalies: exchange asymmetries and the willingness-to-accept/willingness-to-pay disparity. This paper provides both theoretical and experimental evidence which suggests that uncertainty in preferences can explain at least part of these behavioral anomalies. The experiments rely on chocolate and a ``taste'' treatment, where individuals in a treatment group are allowed to taste a small amount of chocolate before making their trade or valuation decisions.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso">en_US</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject">Economics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject">Agriculture economics</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject">Auction</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject">Experimental</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject">conservation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject">uncertainty</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title">Essays on Conservation Auctions and Uncertainty in Preferences</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">dissertation or thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="discipline">Applied Economics and Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="grantor">Cornell University</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="level">Doctor of Philosophy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">Ph. D., Applied Economics and Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dcterms" element="license">https://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtual" qualifier="collection" authority="https://cornell-ecommons.eks.prod.4science.cloud/handle/1813/57467" confidence="600">Applied Economics and Management PhD Dissertations</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtual" qualifier="collection" authority="https://cornell-ecommons.eks.prod.4science.cloud/handle/1813/47" confidence="600">Cornell Theses and Dissertations</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtual" qualifier="author">Otto, Steven</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtualsource" qualifier="collection">cdf997a8-0b54-4bd8-bb4f-15522783f4d6</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtualsource" qualifier="collection">5893a6ea-7af3-41d7-abc6-04bcd26ab5df</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="06a37177-56f3-495c-ac88-d5477d0a8ebe">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>en_US&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Essays on Conservation Auctions and Uncertainty in Preferences&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2018-08-30&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;DOI>https://doi.org/10.7298/X4H993D2&lt;/DOI>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Otto, Steven&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;Keyword>Economics&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Agriculture economics&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Auction&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Experimental&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>conservation&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>uncertainty&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>This dissertation includes two chapters. The first presents a new auction mechanism designed for conservation programs. Individuals compensated for conserving their land often extract substantial profits from the government or non-governmental agency funding the conservation program. These rents limit the amount of land which can be conserved, which decreases total surplus for society. The new auction mechanism, the Provision Point Reverse Auction, was designed to mitigate this rent-seeking behavior. This paper presents both theoretical and experimental evidence to substantiate the efficacy of the mechanism. The second chapter considers the effect that preference uncertainty may have on two commonly observed behavioral anomalies: exchange asymmetries and the willingness-to-accept/willingness-to-pay disparity. This paper provides both theoretical and experimental evidence which suggests that uncertainty in preferences can explain at least part of these behavioral anomalies. The experiments rely on chocolate and a ``taste&amp;apos;&amp;apos; treatment, where individuals in a treatment group are allowed to taste a small amount of chocolate before making their trade or valuation decisions.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>