<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href='static/style.xsl' type='text/xsl'?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T17:57:25Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/37145" metadataPrefix="dim">https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/37145</identifier><datestamp>2026-05-14T13:51:39Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1813_35</setSpec><setSpec>col_1813_47</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Lim, Yisook</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="chair" lang="en_US">Rubineau, Brian</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="coChair" lang="en_US">Burton, Mary Diane</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="committeeMember" lang="en_US">Brashears, Matthew Edward</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2014-07-28T19:25:07Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2019-05-26T06:00:29Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2014-05-25</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1813/37145</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="bibid">8641254</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">This paper explores the question of how social status influences negative tie formation. Although previous literature in network scholarship has identified the role of social status in tie formation, it has mainly focused on the presence and the absence of positive ties such as friendship and exchange partnership as outcomes. However, another possible significant outcome has been neglected, namely the creation of negative ties. This relative neglect of negative ties has limited the understanding of status claims and network dynamics. In the current paper, I develop and test sets of competing possibilities about the role of status in the formation of negative ties. In using original 56 distinct social networks with negative tie data, I find that social status plays an important role in negative tie formation. In particular, I find that negative ties occur disproportionately from individuals of higher status and are directed towards individuals of lower status. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">en_US</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Negative Tie</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Social Status</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Social Network</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">The Role Of Social Status In Negative Tie Formation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">dissertation or thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="discipline">Industrial and Labor Relations</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="grantor" lang="en_US">Cornell University</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="level">Master of Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">M.S., Industrial and Labor Relations</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtual" qualifier="collection" authority="https://cornell-ecommons.eks.prod.4science.cloud/handle/1813/47" confidence="600">Cornell Theses and Dissertations</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtual" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Lim, Yisook</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtualsource" qualifier="collection">5893a6ea-7af3-41d7-abc6-04bcd26ab5df</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="099d1cfa-a484-44a3-9697-bb44df148595">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>en_US&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>The Role Of Social Status In Negative Tie Formation&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2014-05-25&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Lim, Yisook&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;Keyword>Negative Tie&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Social Status&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Social Network&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>This paper explores the question of how social status influences negative tie formation. Although previous literature in network scholarship has identified the role of social status in tie formation, it has mainly focused on the presence and the absence of positive ties such as friendship and exchange partnership as outcomes. However, another possible significant outcome has been neglected, namely the creation of negative ties. This relative neglect of negative ties has limited the understanding of status claims and network dynamics. In the current paper, I develop and test sets of competing possibilities about the role of status in the formation of negative ties. In using original 56 distinct social networks with negative tie data, I find that social status plays an important role in negative tie formation. In particular, I find that negative ties occur disproportionately from individuals of higher status and are directed towards individuals of lower status. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>