<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href='static/style.xsl' type='text/xsl'?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T23:13:00Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/113016" metadataPrefix="dim">https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/113016</identifier><datestamp>2026-05-15T19:40:26Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1813_35</setSpec><setSpec>col_1813_47</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Granados, German</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="chair" lang="en_US">Giordano, Julio</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="committeeMember" lang="en_US">Nydam, Daryl</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2023-03-31T16:40:24Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2023-03-31T16:40:24Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2022-12</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="other">ProQuest Submission ID: 11635</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="other">ProQuest Publication ID: 30000875</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://hdl.handle.net/1813/113016</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="doi">https://doi.org/10.7298/nh2q-9771</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="bibid">15644085</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">157 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The overarching objective of the research presented in this thesis was to characterize associations between cow, herd, and environmental data with insemination outcome, and develop  machine learning algorithms (MLA) to predict the outcome of the first service (FS) after calving  in lactating dairy cows. The specific objective of the study presented in Chapter I was to  compare patterns of multiple cow behavioral, physiological, and performance parameters  collected by automated sensors before insemination for cows that became pregnant or not at FS.  A secondary objective was to explore associations between pregnancy outcome at FS with  previous gestation and early lactation performance and events, and with environmental  conditions before insemination. An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted using  data collected at a commercial dairy farm. Daily values for milk yield, milk components percent  and yield, rumination and eating activity, physical and walking activity, resting time and bouts,  body temperature, milk conductivity, and body weight collected by wearable and non-wearable  sensors from -14 to 56 d after calving for 932 primiparous and 2,070 multiparous cows with a FS  pregnancy outcome were available for analysis. Daily data were summarized as the average of  seven periods of 4 to 7 d long from -14 to 56 d after calving and from -27 to -11, -10 to -3, -2 to - 1 d relative to timed AI for FS. The most notable differences observed for primiparous cows  were greater milk yield, milk components yield, and fewer lying bouts per day for pregnant than  non-pregnant cows. For the multiparous cow group, non-pregnant cows produced more milk and  milk fat, had greater body temperature, more activity, more resting time, and had greater body  weight changes after calving than pregnant cows. Associations of different strength and direction  between FS outcome with previous gestation and previous and current lactation features, events,  and performance for primiparous and multiparous cows were observed. Substantial variability  between parity groups for the direction and magnitude of differences between pregnant and nonpregnant cows warrants use of parity either as a model predictor, or the development of parityspecific models for predicting FS outcome of lactating dairy cows. Chapter II of this thesis  presents the development and performance of multiple MLA for predicting FS outcome using  data presented in Chapter I. Decision Trees, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and  Extreme Gradient Boosting models were built and evaluated for primiparous and multiparous  only and for both parities combined. Overall, we observed that these MLA trained with a  combination of automated sensor cow behavioral, physiological and performance data, as well as  herd outcomes and environmental data presented a wide range of performance. The best  performing algorithms (i.e., most performance metrics values in the 90 to 95% range) were those  for primiparous cows using Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression models. Overall,  the performance of MLA for multiparous cows was poor (i.e., all performance metrics &lt;70%)  considering the implications of predictions for practical application. In conclusion, different  supervised MLA trained with a combination of cow parameters collected by automated wearable  and non-wearable sensors, herd outcomes, and farm environmental conditions, presented large  variation in performance despite using the same input data and the same algorithms. Large  variation in algorithm performance due to parity suggested that different models might have to  be developed for predicting FS outcome for primiparous and multiparous cows. Further research  is needed to identify a combination of predictors, methods to summarize input data from  predictors, and develop procedures to train MLA that yield the level of performance required for  practical use of algorithms in commercial farms.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Dairy cow</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Machine Learning</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Parameters</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Prediction</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Pregnancy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Sensor</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">CHARACTERIZATION OF SENSOR AND NON-SENSOR COW, HERD MANAGEMENT, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AND USE OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR PREDICTION OF PREGNANCY IN DAIRY CATTLE</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">dissertation or thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="relation" qualifier="localuri">https://newcatalog.library.cornell.edu/catalog/15644085</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="discipline">Animal Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="grantor">Cornell University</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="level">Master of Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="thesis" element="degree" qualifier="name">M.S., Animal Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dcterms" element="license">https://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810.2</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtual" qualifier="collection" authority="https://cornell-ecommons.eks.prod.4science.cloud/handle/1813/47" confidence="600">Cornell Theses and Dissertations</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtual" qualifier="author">Granados, German</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cris" element="virtualsource" qualifier="collection">5893a6ea-7af3-41d7-abc6-04bcd26ab5df</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="013fc983-8455-4edb-9c8a-e863d2dd1b88">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>en&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>CHARACTERIZATION OF SENSOR AND NON-SENSOR COW, HERD MANAGEMENT, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AND USE OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR PREDICTION OF PREGNANCY IN DAIRY CATTLE&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2022-12&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;DOI>https://doi.org/10.7298/nh2q-9771&lt;/DOI>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Granados, German&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;Keyword>Dairy cow&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Machine Learning&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Parameters&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Prediction&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Pregnancy&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Sensor&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The overarching objective of the research presented in this thesis was to characterize associations between cow, herd, and environmental data with insemination outcome, and develop  machine learning algorithms (MLA) to predict the outcome of the first service (FS) after calving  in lactating dairy cows. The specific objective of the study presented in Chapter I was to  compare patterns of multiple cow behavioral, physiological, and performance parameters  collected by automated sensors before insemination for cows that became pregnant or not at FS.  A secondary objective was to explore associations between pregnancy outcome at FS with  previous gestation and early lactation performance and events, and with environmental  conditions before insemination. An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted using  data collected at a commercial dairy farm. Daily values for milk yield, milk components percent  and yield, rumination and eating activity, physical and walking activity, resting time and bouts,  body temperature, milk conductivity, and body weight collected by wearable and non-wearable  sensors from -14 to 56 d after calving for 932 primiparous and 2,070 multiparous cows with a FS  pregnancy outcome were available for analysis. Daily data were summarized as the average of  seven periods of 4 to 7 d long from -14 to 56 d after calving and from -27 to -11, -10 to -3, -2 to - 1 d relative to timed AI for FS. The most notable differences observed for primiparous cows  were greater milk yield, milk components yield, and fewer lying bouts per day for pregnant than  non-pregnant cows. For the multiparous cow group, non-pregnant cows produced more milk and  milk fat, had greater body temperature, more activity, more resting time, and had greater body  weight changes after calving than pregnant cows. Associations of different strength and direction  between FS outcome with previous gestation and previous and current lactation features, events,  and performance for primiparous and multiparous cows were observed. Substantial variability  between parity groups for the direction and magnitude of differences between pregnant and nonpregnant cows warrants use of parity either as a model predictor, or the development of parityspecific models for predicting FS outcome of lactating dairy cows. Chapter II of this thesis  presents the development and performance of multiple MLA for predicting FS outcome using  data presented in Chapter I. Decision Trees, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and  Extreme Gradient Boosting models were built and evaluated for primiparous and multiparous  only and for both parities combined. Overall, we observed that these MLA trained with a  combination of automated sensor cow behavioral, physiological and performance data, as well as  herd outcomes and environmental data presented a wide range of performance. The best  performing algorithms (i.e., most performance metrics values in the 90 to 95% range) were those  for primiparous cows using Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression models. Overall,  the performance of MLA for multiparous cows was poor (i.e., all performance metrics &amp;lt;70%)  considering the implications of predictions for practical application. In conclusion, different  supervised MLA trained with a combination of cow parameters collected by automated wearable  and non-wearable sensors, herd outcomes, and farm environmental conditions, presented large  variation in performance despite using the same input data and the same algorithms. Large  variation in algorithm performance due to parity suggested that different models might have to  be developed for predicting FS outcome for primiparous and multiparous cows. Further research  is needed to identify a combination of predictors, methods to summarize input data from  predictors, and develop procedures to train MLA that yield the level of performance required for  practical use of algorithms in commercial farms.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>