Union Administrative Practices: A Comparative Analysis
No Access Until
In response to growing challenges, many labor organizations are reevaluating themselves in an effort to become more efficient and effective. Their efforts, however, are limited by their frames of reference. Seldom do unions compare practices across labor movements. To expand these frames of reference we compare union administrative practices in three countries: Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Two specific areas of union administration are examined — human resource/personnel practices and strategic planning. Results from these countries are presented and analyzed to identify and explain similarities and differences.
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
union; administration; analysis; efficiency; Canada; United Kingdom; international; United States; human resources; personnel practices; strategic planning
Number of Workers
Based on Related Item
Has Other Format(s)
Part of Related Item
Link(s) to Related Publication(s)
Link(s) to Reference(s)
Previously Published As
Required Publisher Statement: Copyright by Springer. Final version published as Clark, P. F., Gilbert, K., Gray, L. G., & Solomon, N. (1998) Union administrative practices: A comparative analysis. Journal of Labor Research, 19(1), 189-201.