Effect Of Variety, Storage And Ripeness Of Apples (Malus Domestica Borkh.) On Physical And Chemical Parameters Affecting Applesauce Rheological Properties
Files
No Access Until
Permanent Link(s)
Collections
Other Titles
Author(s)
Abstract
Over 3 harvest years (2009, 2010 and 2011), rheological properties of applesauce in relation to fruit ripening and sauce physical and chemical parameters were assessed. Ten varieties were used to obtain single-variety applesauce (Ben Davis, Cortland, Crispin, Empire, Golden Delicious, Idared, Jonagold, McIntosh, Rhode Island Greening, Rome Beauty) by hot and cold-break methods. The effect of storage and fruit ripening were studied using different post-harvest conditions: Cold storage (1-4 °C at 95% relative humidity) for up to 8 months. Sauce was prepared monthly for collection of at least 5 experimental points. Varying storage temperatures for assessing the benefit of controlled post -harvest fruit ripening - 10 and 21 °C for up to 30 days. Sauce was prepared every 3-7 days for collection of at least 5 experimental points. Controlled atmosphere (CA) storage (1-3% O2 and 1-4% CO2 at 1-4 °C). Apples out of CA storage were held at 10 °C for up to 35 days. Sauce was prepared every 3-7 days for collection of at least 5 experimental points and results were compared to those of freshly harvested apples subjected to controlled post-harvest fruit ripening. Apples were evaluated for ripeness (firmness, pH, acidity, soluble solids); and applesauce for rheology (USDA consistency, yield stress, consistency index and serum capillary viscosity) and physical and chemical parameters - particle size distribution (PSD), mean particle size (MPS) and particle size distribution span (PSDS); moisture, calcium, starch, alcohol insoluble residue (AIR), total soluble pectin (TSP) and pectin degree of methoxylation (PDM). Results were analyzed by ANOVA and significant differences among means determined by Tukey's test (p [LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO]0.05). Harvest year, variety, storage condition, fruit ripeness and their interaction were significant factors for sauce consistency. Differences in rheological parameters are explained by differences in MPS (500-1200 [mu]m) and PSDS (0.9-2.25); starch (0.01-0.78%), AIR (1.5-5.5%) and TSP (0.11-0.75%) contents; and PDM (33-95%). Best consistency applesauce was achieved with smaller MPS ([LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO] 800 [mu]m), larger PSDS ([GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO] 1.5) and/or higher AIR ([GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO] 2.5%), TSP ([GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO] 0.25%) and lower PDM ([LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO] 60%). Differences in chemical parameters of sauce between harvest years might be related to weather conditions affecting apple composition.
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
Description
Sponsorship
Date Issued
Publisher
Keywords
Location
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Sector
Employer
Union
Union Local
NAICS
Number of Workers
Committee Chair
Committee Co-Chair
Committee Member
Gomez, Miguel I.