eCommons

 

CQ Reviewers’ Reactions to My Editorial Policies

dc.contributor.authorLynn, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-12T21:04:52Z
dc.date.available2020-09-12T21:04:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.description.abstract[Excerpt] Peer review is an important part of the scientific process. It helps to separate good research from bad so that scarce journal pages and readers’ attention go the former rather than the latter. As editor of Cornell Hospitality Quarterly (CQ), I am particularly dependent on reviewers’ help because CQ is a cross-disciplinary journal whose submissions cover literatures and methodologies that vastly exceed my ken.
dc.description.legacydownloadsLynn119_CQ_Reviewers.pdf: 87 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
dc.identifier.other11334157
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/71776
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectCornell
dc.subjecteditorial
dc.subjectpublishing
dc.subjectempirical articles
dc.subjectwriting
dc.subjectpeer review
dc.titleCQ Reviewers’ Reactions to My Editorial Policies
dc.typearticle
local.authorAffiliationLynn, Michael: wml3@cornell.edu Cornell University School of Hotel Administration

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lynn119_CQ_Reviewers.pdf
Size:
60.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format