CQ Reviewers’ Reactions to My Editorial Policies
dc.contributor.author | Lynn, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-12T21:04:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-12T21:04:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-02-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | [Excerpt] Peer review is an important part of the scientific process. It helps to separate good research from bad so that scarce journal pages and readers’ attention go the former rather than the latter. As editor of Cornell Hospitality Quarterly (CQ), I am particularly dependent on reviewers’ help because CQ is a cross-disciplinary journal whose submissions cover literatures and methodologies that vastly exceed my ken. | |
dc.description.legacydownloads | Lynn119_CQ_Reviewers.pdf: 87 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020. | |
dc.identifier.other | 11334157 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1813/71776 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.rights | Required Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. | |
dc.subject | Cornell | |
dc.subject | editorial | |
dc.subject | publishing | |
dc.subject | empirical articles | |
dc.subject | writing | |
dc.subject | peer review | |
dc.title | CQ Reviewers’ Reactions to My Editorial Policies | |
dc.type | article | |
local.authorAffiliation | Lynn, Michael: wml3@cornell.edu Cornell University School of Hotel Administration |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1