CQ Reviewers’ Reactions to My Editorial Policies
Loading...
No Access Until
Permanent Link(s)
Collections
Other Titles
Authors
Abstract
[Excerpt] Peer review is an important part of the scientific process. It helps to separate good research from bad so that scarce journal pages and readers’ attention go the former rather than the latter. As editor of Cornell Hospitality Quarterly (CQ), I am particularly dependent on reviewers’ help because CQ is a cross-disciplinary journal whose submissions cover literatures and methodologies that vastly exceed my ken.
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
Description
Sponsorship
Date Issued
2018-02-01
Publisher
Keywords
Cornell; editorial; publishing; empirical articles; writing; peer review
Location
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Sector
Employer
Union
Union Local
NAICS
Number of Workers
Committee Chair
Committee Co-Chair
Committee Member
Degree Discipline
Degree Name
Degree Level
Related Version
Related DOI
Related To
Related Part
Based on Related Item
Has Other Format(s)
Part of Related Item
Related To
Related Publication(s)
Link(s) to Related Publication(s)
References
Link(s) to Reference(s)
Previously Published As
Government Document
ISBN
ISMN
ISSN
Other Identifiers
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Rights URI
Types
article