Realism Versus Idealism at Nuremburg: The Creation of the Court
| dc.contributor.author | Campbell-Mohn, Emma | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-11T23:30:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-11T23:30:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-05-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The creation of the Nuremberg Court following World War II exemplified international cooperation, particularly between the Great Powers: the United States, France, the Soviet Union, and Great Britain. Expounding the benefits of justice and the rule of law, the Nuremberg Trials are often viewed as the pinnacle of Wilsonian idealism. However, further examination reveals the actions of the Roosevelt administration were not derived from a united Cabinet seeking to realize broad principles of humanitarian justice and equality. Instead of being a unified decision based on these values, the reasoning behind the creation of the Nuremberg Court was hotly disputed. The Court was formed for multiple reasons: to ensure that Germany could not claim restitution for wartime losses; to prevent formation of a new court directed by the United Nations; and to punish Germany for its crimes. Therefore, the reasoning behind the creation of the Nuremberg Court contained realist logic. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Campbell-Mohn, Emma. "Realism Versus Idealism at Nuremburg The Creation of the Court." Cornell International Affairs Review Vol. 7, Iss. 2 (Spring 2014). https://doi.org/10.37513/ciar.v7i2.451. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.37513/ciar.v7i2.451 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1813/114952 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Cornell University Library | en_US |
| dc.title | Realism Versus Idealism at Nuremburg: The Creation of the Court | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
| schema.issueNumber | Vol. 7, Iss. 2 (Spring 2014) | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1