The Case for America's Continued Superpower Status
| dc.contributor.author | Shiraev, Dennis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gibson, Grant | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-11T23:16:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-11T23:16:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009-05-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Is America really in decline as a global superpower? We examine current arguments for America’s economic decline and argue that a purely economic analysis is insufficient for evaluating a country’s status as a global superpower. Our comprehensive definition of superpower incorporates military strength, internal stability, and the global attractiveness of a state’s culture and ideology that it presents to the rest of the world. America is the only state fitting of this comprehensive definition of a superpower in the 21st century, while all other states frequently cited as emerging global powers fail to meet the criteria we lay out in this paper. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Gibson, Grant. "The Case for America's Continued Superpower Status." Cornell International Affairs Review Vol. 2, Iss. 2 (Spring 2009). https://doi.org/10.37513/ciar.v2i2.366. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.37513/ciar.v2i2.366 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1813/114868 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Cornell University Library | en_US |
| dc.title | The Case for America's Continued Superpower Status | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
| schema.issueNumber | Vol. 2, Iss. 2 (Spring 2009) | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1