Leaving Against Medical Advice: What's a Nurse to Do?
Access Restricted
Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.
During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.
No Access Until
Permanent Link(s)
Collections
Other Titles
Author(s)
Abstract
Each year approximately 1% to 2% of patient acute care discharges in United States hospitals are described as against medical advice (AMA). AMA discharges are associated with higher patient morbidity, increased risk of readmission, and higher mortality. Most discussions dealing with AMA discharge tend to focus on physicians. However, nurses have a pivotal role in the care process and in ensuring the safety of patients. The aim of this paper is to increase awareness regarding nurses' ethical responsibilities when confronting AMA discharges. We highlight nurses' leadership role in discharge planning and argue that they have moral obligations to promote as safe a discharge as possible. Such obligations are consistent with nursing codes of ethics, according to which nurses have a primary moral duty to promote patients' well-being. Moreover, nurses' training, expertise, and scope of practice place them in an ideal situation to address problems related to AMA discharges. We also offer suggestions that can contribute to helping nurses to fulfill their ethical responsibilities in this context.