Women's Pay in Australia, Great Britain and the United States: Commentary

dc.contributor.author	Ehrenberg, Ronald G.
dc.date.accessioned	2020-11-17T17:16:52Z
dc.date.available	2020-11-17T17:16:52Z
dc.date.issued	1989-01-01
dc.description.abstract	[Excerpt] My reaction to this paper is mixed. On the one hand, it represents one of the few serious efforts I know of to place discussions about comparable worth in a comparative perspective and to bring evidence from other countries' experiences into the debate about policy in the United States. For this the authors should be resoundingly applauded. On the other hand, I am left with the feeling that they have not pushed their empirical analyses as hard as they might have, and because of this, in places they may have drawn some inappropriate conclusions. My discussion will elaborate on this latter theme.
dc.description.legacydownloads	Ehrenberg213_Commentary_on_Women_s_Pay010.pdf: 71 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
dc.identifier.other	4323929
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75228
dc.language.iso	en_US
dc.rights	Required Publisher Statement: © National Academy Press. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subject	women
dc.subject	pay equity
dc.subject	Australia
dc.subject	Great Britain
dc.subject	United States
dc.subject	gender
dc.subject	compensation
dc.title	Women's Pay in Australia, Great Britain and the United States: Commentary
dc.type	article
local.authorAffiliation	Ehrenberg, Ronald G.: rge2@cornell.edu Cornell University

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1