Memory
Access Restricted
Access to this document is restricted. Some items have been embargoed at the request of the author, but will be made publicly available after the "No Access Until" date.
During the embargo period, you may request access to the item by clicking the link to the restricted file(s) and completing the request form. If we have contact information for a Cornell author, we will contact the author and request permission to provide access. If we do not have contact information for a Cornell author, or the author denies or does not respond to our inquiry, we will not be able to provide access. For more information, review our policies for restricted content.
No Access Until
Permanent Link(s)
Collections
Other Titles
Author(s)
Abstract
This essay is one of more than a dozen in this volume to honor the late Mary Margaret Steedly. The paper’s theme is “memory.” Steedly described memories as “densely layered, sometimes conflictual negotiations with the passage of time.” According to her, memories do not serve to complete or set straight a historical record—and in her work she did not try to locate authentic, oppositional voices or to excavate evidence by which to contest official historical accounts. She refused a naïve and instrumentalist approach to memory as a source of subaltern truths to be tapped. Experiences are always already dressed in narratives that anticipate and prefigure them, cast through and against iconic figures and dominant tropes, and reworked in dialogue with other stories and subsequent occurrences. Memories have specific tellers and tellings, but they never belong, finally, to a single speaker or moment. What matters, then, Steedly wrote, is “not what really happened … but rather why [something came] to be recalled and retold in one particular way and not another … and what might be at stake” in that particular time and manner of telling.