Drug Price Control Policy And Access To Malarial Drugs In India

Other Titles
Abstract
This dissertation investigates the effects of a drug price control policy implemented in India on consumer welfare. Methodologically this relates to estimation of endogenous product choice game of multi-product firms in a static framework. It builds on the existing literature on price control policy and literature on endogenous product choice and seeks to make two contributions. First, through empirical analysis, it demonstrates that not all price controls are equal. In fact, some price control policies could actually hurt consumers relative to the situation with no price controls. This is because, while price controls lower prices and make pharmaceutical products more affordable, they might backfire if firms respond to these policies by withdrawing from the market, which would result in reduced access. On one hand, unregulated prices, if too high, preclude most consumers from purchasing these drugs. On the other hand, regulated prices, if too low, result in few products being offered on the market. Second, it builds on the Moment inequality literature, and proposes a solution to a selection problem that arises while estimating cost parameters using (observed) firms' endogenous choices of product portfolio. In this analysis, we focus on drugs that cure malaria, an important neglected disease in the context of the Indian pharmaceutical market. We use a novel and unique dataset which features detailed region level sales and price data. We exploit the significant demographic heterogeneity across different regions in India to estimate a two stage game, where firms endogenously make product entry and exit decisions across different markets as well as fix prices of the offered products. The richness of the model requires us to confront econometric challenges associated with multiplicity of equilibria, endogeneity, and inference in partially identified models, as well as computational challenges associated with the high dimensionality of the problem. Our estimation results show that there is substantial variation in demand elasticities and willingness-to-pay across different regions in India, and that firms incur significant fixed costs for making the developed drugs available in the local markets. Moreover, fixed costs are heterogeneous across firms and across regions. The results of our counterfactual analysis show that under price control, small domestic firms and foreign firms withdraw their products, and markets become more concentrated. In most cases, only the big-domestic firms continue producing the drugs. Depending on the level of price control, the loss in consumer welfare due to products withdrawal may exceed the gain in consumer welfare resulting from lower prices, leading to an overall decrease in consumer welfare.
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
Description
Sponsorship
Date Issued
2016-05-29
Publisher
Keywords
Pharmaceutical; Entry Game; Moment Inequality
Location
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Sector
Employer
Union
Union Local
NAICS
Number of Workers
Committee Chair
Easley,David Alan
Committee Co-Chair
Barwick,Panle Jia
Committee Member
Backus,Matthew R.
Molinari,Francesca
Blume,Lawrence Edward
Degree Discipline
Economics
Degree Name
Ph. D., Economics
Degree Level
Doctor of Philosophy
Related Version
Related DOI
Related To
Related Part
Based on Related Item
Has Other Format(s)
Part of Related Item
Related To
Related Publication(s)
Link(s) to Related Publication(s)
References
Link(s) to Reference(s)
Previously Published As
Government Document
ISBN
ISMN
ISSN
Other Identifiers
Rights
Rights URI
Types
dissertation or thesis
Accessibility Feature
Accessibility Hazard
Accessibility Summary
Link(s) to Catalog Record