ILR Impact Brief - Employee Attributions about HR Practices Lead to Customer Satisfaction
No Access Until
[Excerpt] The perceived reasons why management chooses a set of HR practices are linked to employee satisfaction, commitment, and on-the-job behavior. Employees individually make their own attributions about the purposes behind the practices, which are, in turn, associated with employees’ attitudes: a perception that management cares about service (or product) quality and employee well-being is associated with positive attitudes, but a sense that management is intent on cost cutting or employee exploitation is associated with negative attitudes. Furthermore, individual attitudes are shared within work units and in their aggregate are associated with “organizational citizenship behaviors;” i.e., group-level satisfaction and commitment are associated with intra-unit helping behaviors, which are linked to enhanced unit performance and customer satisfaction.
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
The ILR Impact Brief series highlights the research and project based work conducted by ILR faculty that is relevant to workplace issues and public policy. The Briefs are prepared by Maralyn Edid, Senior Extension Associate, ILR School.
human resource management; HR practices; customer satisfaction; performance; customer service
Number of Workers
For a more in-depth analysis, please see: Nishii, L. N., Lepak, D. P. & Schneider, B. (2008). ““Employee attributions of the ‘why’ of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction”. Personnel Psychology (forthcoming).
Based on Related Item
Has Other Format(s)
Part of Related Item
Link(s) to Related Publication(s)
Link(s) to Reference(s)
Previously Published As
Required Publisher Statement: Copyright by Cornell University.