Means to an End: An Assessment of the Status-blind Approach to Protecting Undocumented Worker Rights
Loading...
No Access Until
Permanent Link(s)
Other Titles
Authors
Abstract
This article applies the tenets of bureaucratic incorporation theory to an investigation of bureaucratic decision making in labor standards enforcement agencies (LSEAs), as they relate to undocumented workers. Drawing on 25 semistructured interviews with high-level officials in San Jose and Houston, I find that bureaucrats in both cities routinely evade the issue of immigration status during the claims-making process, and directly challenge employers’ attempts to use the undocumented status of their workers to deflect liability. Respondents offer three institutionalized narratives for this approach: (1) to deter employer demand for undocumented labor, (2) the conviction that the protection of undocumented workers is essential to the agency’s ability to regulate industry standards for all workers, and (3) to clearly demarcate the agency’s jurisdictional boundaries to preserve institutional autonomy and scarce resources. Within this context, enforcing the rights of undocumented workers becomes simply an institutional means to an end.
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
Description
Sponsorship
Date Issued
2014-01-01
Publisher
Keywords
labor; immigration; bureaucracy
Location
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Sector
Employer
Union
Union Local
NAICS
Number of Workers
Committee Chair
Committee Co-Chair
Committee Member
Degree Discipline
Degree Name
Degree Level
Related Version
Related DOI
Related To
Related Part
Based on Related Item
Has Other Format(s)
Part of Related Item
Related To
Related Publication(s)
Link(s) to Related Publication(s)
References
Link(s) to Reference(s)
Previously Published As
Government Document
ISBN
ISMN
ISSN
Other Identifiers
Rights
Required Publisher Statement: © SAGE. Final version published as: Gleeson, S. (2014). Means to an end: An assessment of the status-blind approach to protecting undocumented worker rights [Electronic version]. Sociological Perspectives, 57(3), 301-320. doi: 10.1177/0731121414523733 Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Rights URI
Types
article