The Measurement of Perceived Intraorganizational Power: A Multi-Respondent Perspective

dc.contributor.authorEnz, Cathy A.
dc.description.abstractThis study found substantial divergence between a general measure of perceived departmental power and an issue-specific measure, and indicates a conceptual distinctiveness between these two common perceptual measures. Using the assessments of three different respondent groups allowed for the cross-validation of the power measures while highlighting differences in perceptions based on group membership. The findings of this study raise the possibility that different dimensions of power (enacted versus potential power) are not equally reflected in the two perceptual measures when departmental members and top managers are the groups assessing each subunit’s power. Measurement distinctiveness was not found to exist when other departments’ members evaluated each subunit’s power. This investigation suggests that future studies of power would benefit from utilizing more than one perceptual measure and more than one group of respondents.
dc.description.legacydownloadsEnz93_The_Measurement_of_Perceived_Intra_Organizational_Power.pdf: 323 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © SAGE. Final version published as: Enz, C. (1989). The measurement of perceived intraorganizational power: a multi-respondent perspective. Organization Studies, 10(2), 241-251. doi:10.1177/017084068901000207 Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectdepartmental power
dc.subjectpower measures
dc.subjectgroup membership
dc.subjectenacted power
dc.subjectpotential power
dc.titleThe Measurement of Perceived Intraorganizational Power: A Multi-Respondent Perspective
local.authorAffiliationEnz, Cathy A.: Cornell University School of Hotel Administration
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
487.67 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format