Library

eCommons

 

THE IMPRECISION OF BODY WEIGHT REGULATION IN RESPONSE TO A LACK OF COMPENSATION TO IMPOSED ENERGETIC CHALLENGES

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSewall, Anna
dc.contributor.chairLevitsky, David A.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGilovich, Thomas Dashiff
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBarre, Laura K.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLibert, Sergiy
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-15T15:29:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-05T06:00:44Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-30
dc.description.abstractObesity and associated pathologies of being overweight is now the number one preventable cause of death and is a serious public health threat. Research indicates the cause of obesity is due to a chronic hypercaloric intake, ergo, treatment and prevention should be targeted at eating behaviors. While many believe in the Set Point theory, that is, body weight is tightly regulated and programed to be a specific value, evidence suggests otherwise. Data show that there is poor regulation of body weight (fat) and physiological mechanisms do not precisely correct for energy imbalances. This dissertation examines the precision of body weight regulation and attempts to identify practical strategies to prevent weight gain. First a review of the literature discusses various energetic challenges and examines how precise humans compensate. Furthermore, quantifies the range of energetic error before physiological mechanisms correct for the imbalance. A pilot study was conducted to investigate if a daily 12-hour fast would prevent weight gain and affect sleep behavior. Due to poor adherence, we were unable to draw conclusions about time restricted feeding (TRF). A larger TRF study among adults was conducted to test TRF as a weight management tool and sleep aid. TRF did not cause significant weight loss, but it did significantly improve sleep quality. No research has investigated the feasibility or acceptability of TRF as a lifestyle, so individual interviews were conducted among 21 TRF participants. Experiences with TRF were mixed. The largest positive aspect was an improved sense of control and self-efficacy. The largest negative aspect reported was a hindrance on socializing. Mixed experiences indicate TRF may not be a feasible lifestyle for everyone. Future research should attempt to identify characteristics of individuals who may be more successful at TRF. Finally, a blind cross-over portion reduction study attempted to find the point at which participants compensate for a reduced portion and increase intake of another food. At no point (up to 25% reduction) did participants compensate and increase consumption of dessert. This study was the first to directly measure effects of portion reduction in a within-meal setting.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7298/5wh8-d132
dc.identifier.otherSewall_cornellgrad_0058F_11383
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dissertations.umi.com/cornellgrad:11383
dc.identifier.otherbibid: 11050303
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/67321
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectcompensation
dc.subjecttime restricted feeding
dc.subjectweight management
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectNutrition
dc.titleTHE IMPRECISION OF BODY WEIGHT REGULATION IN RESPONSE TO A LACK OF COMPENSATION TO IMPOSED ENERGETIC CHALLENGES
dc.typedissertation or thesis
dcterms.licensehttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/59810
thesis.degree.disciplineNutrition
thesis.degree.grantorCornell University
thesis.degree.levelDoctor of Philosophy
thesis.degree.namePh.D., Nutrition

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sewall_cornellgrad_0058F_11383.pdf
Size:
5.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Cornell Theses and Dissertations