The Proposed U.S.-Panama Free Trade Agreement
MetadataShow full item record
Hornbeck, J. F.
[Excerpt] On June 28, 2007, after two and a half years of negotiation, the United States and Panama signed a reciprocal free trade agreement (FTA). Negotiations were formally concluded on December 16, 2006, with an understanding that further changes to labor, environment, and intellectual property rights (IPR) chapters would be made pursuant to future detailed congressional input. These changes were agreed to in late June 2007, in time for the FTA to be considered under Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) legislation before it expired on July 1, 2007. TPA allows Congress to consider trade implementing bills under expedited procedures. Panama’s legislature approved the FTA 58 to 4 on July 11, 2007. Neither the 110th nor the 111th Congress took up the agreement. The proposed U.S.-Panama FTA is a comprehensive agreement. Some 88% of U.S. commercial and industrial exports would become duty-free upon implementation, with remaining tariffs phased out over a 10-year period. Over 60% of U.S. farm exports to Panama also would achieve immediate duty-free status, with tariffs and tariff rate quotas (TRQs) on select farm products to be phased out by year 17 of the agreement (year 20 for rice). Panama and the United States signed a separate bilateral agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) issues that would recognize U.S. food safety inspection as equivalent to Panamanian standards, which will expedite entry of U.S. meat and poultry exports. The FTA also consummates understandings on telecommunications, services trade, government procurement, investment, and intellectual property rights. The circumstances framing the proposed U.S.-Panama FTA differ considerably from those of two other signed FTAs that have yet to be considered by Congress. The deep concerns that Congress has expressed over Colombia’s violence have not been an issue in the Panama FTA debate, which is framed more by the positive image of a long-standing strategic bilateral relationship based on Panama’s canal. Nor does Panama compare well with the continuing debate over the proposed FTA with South Korea, which as a major U.S. trading partner, can affect key industries such as automobile and beef production. To the contrary, Panama trades little with the United States, even by Latin American standards, and so although particular industries may be affected to some degree, and U.S. investment is relatively important in Panama, the FTA cannot have a major effect on the U.S. economy as a whole. The final text of the proposed U.S.-Panama FTA incorporates amendments on key issues based on congressional input in 2007. The most significant were adoption of enforceable labor standards, compulsory adherence to select multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), and an easing of restrictions on developing country access to generic drugs. In these cases, the proposed U.S.- Panama FTA goes beyond provisions in existing bilateral FTAs and multilateral trade rules. Congress is still debating two major issues: labor and tax transparency. Concerns over Panama’s labor code have been addressed by legislation in Panama, yet to be enacted. One issue on minimum workers needed to form a union has not been addressed for the apparent lack of support even among labor groups in Panama. Congress also requires that Panama amend its tax laws to incorporate changes necessary to implement the recently signed Tax Information and Exchange Agreement (TIEA), which would provide greater transparency in support of curbing money laundering related to drug trafficking. Legislation has been passed, but work remains to be done on a few bills, including a final vote on approving the TIEA. It remains to be seen if these final changes will be sufficient for the FTA to be approved by a majority in the U.S. Congress.
Panama; free trade agreement; FTA; trade; Congress; legislation