dc.contributor.author Sargent, John F. Jr. dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-25T15:19:42Z dc.date.available 2020-11-25T15:19:42Z dc.date.issued 2011-01-19 dc.identifier.other 1871871 dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/1813/78158 dc.description.abstract [Excerpt] Nanoscale science, engineering and technology—commonly referred to collectively as nanotechnology—is believed by many to offer extraordinary economic and societal benefits. Congress has demonstrated continuing support for nanotechnology and has directed its attention primarily to three topics that may affect the realization of this hoped for potential: federal research and development (R&D) in nanotechnology; U.S. competitiveness; and environmental, health, and safety (EHS) concerns. This report provides an overview of these topics—which are discussed in more detail in other CRS reports—and two others: nanomanufacturing and public understanding of and attitudes toward nanotechnology. The development of this emerging field has been fostered by significant and sustained public investments in nanotechnology R&D. Nanotechnology R&D is directed toward the understanding and control of matter at dimensions of roughly 1 to 100 nanometers. At this size, the properties of matter can differ in fundamental and potentially useful ways from the properties of individual atoms and molecules and of bulk matter. Since the launch of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in 2000 through FY2011, Congress has appropriated approximately $14.2 billion for nanotechnology R&D, including approximately$1.8 billion in FY2011 funding under the current continuing resolution (P.L. 111-322). More than 60 nations have established similar programs. In 2006 alone, total global public R&D investments reached an estimated $6.4 billion, complemented by an estimated private sector investment of$6.0 billion. Data on economic outputs used to assess competitiveness in mature technologies and industries, such as revenues and market share, are not available for assessing nanotechnology. Alternatively, data on inputs (e.g., R&D expenditures) and non-financial outputs (e.g., scientific papers, patents) may provide insight into the current U.S. position and serve as bellwethers of future competitiveness. By these criteria, the United States appears to be the overall global leader in nanotechnology, though some believe the U.S. lead may not be as large as it was for previous emerging technologies. Some research has raised concerns about the safety of nanoscale materials. There is general agreement that more information on EHS implications is needed to protect the public and the environment; to assess and manage risks; and to create a regulatory environment that fosters prudent investment in nanotechnology-related innovation. Nanomanufacturing—the bridge between nanoscience and nanotechnology products—may require the development of new technologies, tools, instruments, measurement science, and standards to enable safe, effective, and affordable commercial-scale production of nanotechnology products. Public understanding and attitudes may also affect the environment for R&D, regulation, and market acceptance of products incorporating nanotechnology. In 2003, Congress enacted the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act providing a legislative foundation for some of the activities of the NNI, addressing concerns, establishing programs, assigning agency responsibilities, and setting authorization levels. Legislation has been introduced in the 110th Congress and 111th Congress to amend and reauthorize the act. dc.language.iso en_US dc.subject nanotechnology dc.subject research dc.subject development dc.subject R&D dc.subject Congress dc.subject engineering dc.subject public policy dc.subject legislation dc.title Nanotechnology: A Policy Primer dc.type unassigned dc.description.legacydownloads CRS_Nanotechnology.pdf: 217 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020. local.authorAffiliation Sargent, John F. Jr.: Congressional Research Service
﻿