Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBishop, John H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-25T14:53:12Z
dc.date.available2020-11-25T14:53:12Z
dc.date.issued1991-06-20
dc.identifier.other172526
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/77228
dc.description.abstract[Excerpt] Business leaders are complaining about the declining quality of entry level workers in the U.S. They and others argue correctly that the competitiveness of American companies is threatened by the poor educational background of our frontline workers. Some have responded to these complaints by saying that business should solve its own problems by improving management and beefing up training. Public education should not, it is argued, give business needs much consideration; student and public needs should come first. And indeed there is a grain of truth in the first response, the survival of a business is almost entirely determined by factors which schools, even excellent schools, cannot change. If schools do not improve, businesses must and will adapt to the capabilities of the workers that are available. Functionally illiterate workers are less productive,so domestic companies will survive by paying lower wages. Multinational companies will survive by transferring assets and activities overseas. There is no amount of union power or government regulation that can stop this from happening. When the pie shrinks, the slices shrink as well. The losers will be American workers and all who depend on their productivity including the least fortunate among us. Yes, public and student needs must come first. It is their need for higher wages and a better standard of living which drives the need for higher standards in secondary school. Like Cassandra, employers are warning the nation that its mediocre secondary education system is a Trojan Horse which if not repaired will eventually bring the city down. The warning needs to be heeded not because employers are the daughters of a king, but because their forecast is correct and none of us can escape the city. This paper proposes a strategy for banishing the mediocrity described above and building in its place an excellent American system of secondary education. Before a cure can be prescribed, however, a diagnosis must be made. The first three sections of the paper provide the diagnosis. The fourth and fifth sections propose the cure.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectCAHRS
dc.subjectILR
dc.subjectcenter
dc.subjecthuman resource
dc.subjectjob
dc.subjectworker
dc.subjectadvanced
dc.subjectlabor market
dc.subjectsatisfaction
dc.subjectemployee
dc.subjectwork
dc.subjectmanage
dc.subjectmanagement
dc.subjecttraining
dc.subjectwage
dc.subjectwage rate
dc.subjectsecondary education
dc.subjectrole
dc.subjectstate government
dc.subjectAmerian
dc.subjectstudent
dc.subjectperformance
dc.subjectemployment
dc.subjectschool
dc.subjectrole
dc.titleA Strategy for Achieving Excellence in Secondary Education: The Role of State Government
dc.typepreprint
dc.description.legacydownloads91_24_A_Strategy_for_achieving.pdf: 4575 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationBishop, John H.: Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics