JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Rational and Coalition Models of Job Evaluation: Do More Powerful University Departments Have an Advantage?

Author
Welbourne, Theresa M.; Trevor, Charlie O.
Abstract
Job evaluation research has, to date, focused on the individual as the unit of analysis. After approximately 50 years of study, evidence on the basic assumptions supporting job evaluation is still inconclusive. This study expands the research by employing organizational theory to the topic and studying job evaluation at the group level. Prior work on rational and coalition models of resource allocation is used to develop hypotheses that are tested with six years of job evaluation data from a university. The results support the coalition model and the conclusion that departmental power can affect job evaluation outcomes.
Date Issued
1995-06-01Subject
work; research; employ; job; university; evaluation; model; resource
Type
preprint