Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCompa, Lance A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T17:30:13Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T17:30:13Z
dc.date.issued2002-04-01
dc.identifier.other1640324
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/75995
dc.description.abstractFiling lawsuits in U.S. federal and state courts for workers’ rights violations suffered by workers employed by American corporations abroad is one of several strategies for promoting labour rights. Other strategies include use of labour rights mechanisms in GSP laws, in regional trade agreements like NAFTA and Mercosur, in corporate codes of conduct, in the ILO and other venues. To succeed, such suits must first overcome the strong presumption against extraterritorial effect of U.S. law. Other jurisdictional hurdles like “inconvenient forum” also require caution in bringing suits. However, several cases using common law tort and contract theories as well as international human rights law have recovered substantial actual and punitive damages for workers of U.S. multinational companies in several developing countries. With the right strategic choices, labour rights litigation can be an effective means of advancing workers’ rights in the global economy.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: Copyright held by Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations . Reprinted with permission.
dc.subjectworkers’ rights
dc.subjectfreedom of association
dc.subjectunions
dc.subjectorganizing
dc.subjectlabor law
dc.subjectenforcement
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectlabor movement
dc.titlePursuing International Labour Rights in U.S. Courts: New Uses for Old Tools
dc.typearticle
dc.description.legacydownloadsCompa7_Pursuing_International_Labour_rights.pdf: 1077 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020.
local.authorAffiliationCompa, Lance A.: lac24@cornell.edu Cornell University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics